IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i19p10133-d644069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Expert Caregiver Intervention Targeting Former Caregivers in Finland: A Co-Design and Feasibility Study Using Mixed Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Åkerman

    (Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Fredrica Nyqvist

    (Faculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, 65100 Vaasa, Finland)

  • Laura Coll-Planas

    (Research Group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, 08500 Barcelona, Spain
    Fundació Salut i Envelliment UAB (Foundation on Health and Ageing), Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, 08041 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Annika Wentjärvi

    (Faculty of Health and Welfare, Novia University of Applied Sciences, 65200 Vaasa, Finland)

Abstract

Informal caregivers face risks of social isolation. Given the high prevalence of informal caregivers in Europe, a considerable proportion of the population are also former caregivers. The Finnish Expert Caregiver intervention sought to train former caregivers to become volunteers aiming to support current caregivers through mainly peer support. The aims of this mixed method non-controlled exploratory intervention study were to assess the feasibility of the Finnish Expert Caregiver intervention by co-designing and implementing the intervention, and by assessing demand and practicality with special attention to the impact of COVID-19. The findings imply that the intervention was feasible as it resulted in a co-designed training course consisting of 30 h with 25 participants enrolling and 19 of them trying volunteering activities. The participants reported high scores on well-being at all timepoints of study, however, without statistically significant differences. The analysis of the focus group interviews revealed that the Expert Caregivers experienced the intervention as meaningful and offered them a sense of belonging with the other participants. Apart from using their caregiving past as an asset, the participants also took advantage of other personal skills and resources. Risks of adverse effects were related to the participants’ expectations on their own contribution, demanding peer support recipients, poorly functioning peer support groups, and insufficient distance to one’s caregiving past. The participants stressed the need for continuing support from intervention facilitators. Future studies with larger samples should investigate whether the effects differ between subgroups of participants and explore the perspective of the peer support recipients.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Åkerman & Fredrica Nyqvist & Laura Coll-Planas & Annika Wentjärvi, 2021. "The Expert Caregiver Intervention Targeting Former Caregivers in Finland: A Co-Design and Feasibility Study Using Mixed Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10133-:d:644069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/19/10133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cecilia Avila-Garzon & Jorge Bacca-Acosta, 2024. "Thirty Years of Research and Methodologies in Value Co-Creation and Co-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:19:p:10133-:d:644069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.