IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9727-d636262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Self-Efficacy and Communication Regarding Sexual Agreements among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the USA: Development and Validation of Two Novel Scales

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten B. Neilands

    (Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA)

  • Deepalika Chakravarty

    (Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of Medicine, Division of Prevention Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA)

  • Lynae A. Darbes

    (Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA)

  • Nathan P. O’Brien

    (Center for Research and Education on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA)

  • Ilse S. Gonzalez

    (Center for Research and Education on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA)

  • Colleen C. Hoff

    (Center for Research and Education on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA)

Abstract

HIV disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men (MSM) in the USA. Building upon research on relationship constructs unique to MSM couples’ HIV-prevention needs, we developed two new scales measuring sexual agreement self-efficacy (SASE) and importance of sexual agreement communication (ISAC). Following qualitative item development, we used two large independent samples of MSM couples (N1 = 441, N2 = 388) to conduct scale validation. Exploratory factor analyses indicated both SASE and ISAC to be unidimensional with 7 and 5 items (eigenvalues = 5.68 and 3.50), respectively, with strong factor loadings. Confirmatory factor analyses yielded satisfactory model fit for SASE (CFI = 0.99; SRMR = 0.03) and ISAC (CFI = 0.99; SRMR = 0.05). Reliability was high for SASE (ω = 0.92) and ISAC (ω = 0.84). Predictive validity analysis revealed a protective association between higher scores on both scales and the outcomes of sexual risk behavior and agreement breaks. Convergent and discriminant validity analyses demonstrated associations in the expected directions between these scales and multiple measures of relationship quality. Therefore, SASE and ISAC are two brief, valid, and reliable scales that can facilitate more in-depth explorations of sexual agreements in MSM and thereby contribute greatly to improving our understanding of and ability to intervene on sexual agreements to improve health and relationship outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten B. Neilands & Deepalika Chakravarty & Lynae A. Darbes & Nathan P. O’Brien & Ilse S. Gonzalez & Colleen C. Hoff, 2021. "Assessing Self-Efficacy and Communication Regarding Sexual Agreements among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the USA: Development and Validation of Two Novel Scales," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9727-:d:636262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9727-:d:636262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.