IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9638-d634541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficacy of Renal Replacement Therapy for Rewarming of Patients in Severe Accidental Hypothermia—Systematic Review of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Mendrala

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Silesia, Medykow 14, 40-752 Katowice, Poland)

  • Sylweriusz Kosiński

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Michalowskiego 12, 31-126 Krakow, Poland)

  • Paweł Podsiadło

    (Institute of Medical Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Al. IX Wiekow Kielc 19A, 25-317 Kielce, Poland)

  • Mathieu Pasquier

    (Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, BH 09, CHUV, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Peter Paal

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. John of God Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Kajetanerplatz 1, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Piotr Mazur

    (Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
    Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Pradnicka 80, 31-202 Krakow, Poland)

  • Tomasz Darocha

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Silesia, Medykow 14, 40-752 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) can be used to rewarm patients in deep hypothermia. However, there is still no clear evidence for the effectiveness of RRT in this group of patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the rewarming rates during RRT in patients in severe hypothermia, below or equal to 32 °C. Methods: This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier CRD42021232821). We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases using the keywords hypothermia, renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration, and their abbreviations. The search included only articles in English with no time limit, up until 30 June 2021. Results: From the 795 revised articles, 18 studies including 21 patients, were selected for the final assessment and data extraction. The mean rate of rewarming calculated for all studies combined was 1.9 °C/h (95% CI 1.5–2.3) and did not differ between continuous (2.0 °C/h; 95% CI 0.9–3.0) and intermittent (1.9 °C/h; 95% CI 1.5–2.3) methods ( p > 0.9). Conclusions: Based on the reviewed literature, it is currently not possible to provide high-quality recommendations for RRT use in specific groups of patients in accidental hypothermia. While RRT appears to be a viable rewarming strategy, the choice of rewarming method should always be determined by the specific clinical circumstances, the available resources, and the current resuscitation guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Mendrala & Sylweriusz Kosiński & Paweł Podsiadło & Mathieu Pasquier & Peter Paal & Piotr Mazur & Tomasz Darocha, 2021. "The Efficacy of Renal Replacement Therapy for Rewarming of Patients in Severe Accidental Hypothermia—Systematic Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9638-:d:634541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9638/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9638/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9638-:d:634541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.