IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9440-d630597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practice Effects, Test–Retest Reliability, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test in Patients with Schizophrenia

Author

Listed:
  • Posen Lee

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan)

  • Ping-Chia Li

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan)

  • Chin-Hsuan Liu

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
    Department of Occupational Therapy, Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung 80276, Taiwan)

  • Hung-Yu Lin

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Yu Huang

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
    School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan)

  • Ching-Lin Hsieh

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
    School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10051, Taiwan
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10002, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background: The Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test (RSAT) is designed to measure selective attention. It tests automatic detection speed (ADS), automatic detection errors (ADE), automatic detection accuracy (ADA), controlled search speed (CSS), controlled search errors (CSE), and controlled search accuracy (CSA). The purpose of this study was to examine the test–retest reliability, practice effect, and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the RSAT in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: A total of 101 patients with schizophrenia completed the RSAT twice at a 4-week interval. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), paired t test, and effect size were used to examine the test–retest reliability and practice effect. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and MDC were calculated. Results: The difference scores between the two assessments were significant in all the indexes. The absolute effect sizes were 0.14 to 0.30. The ICCs of the RSAT ranged from 0.69 to 0.91. The MDC% in the indexes of ADS, ADA, and CSA of the RSAT were <30%. Conclusions: The RSAT is reliable for assessing selective attention in patients with schizophrenia. The RSAT has good to excellent test–retest reliability, a trivial to small practice effect, and indexes of ADS, ADA, and CSA, representing acceptable random measurement error.

Suggested Citation

  • Posen Lee & Ping-Chia Li & Chin-Hsuan Liu & Hung-Yu Lin & Chien-Yu Huang & Ching-Lin Hsieh, 2021. "Practice Effects, Test–Retest Reliability, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test in Patients with Schizophrenia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9440-:d:630597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9440-:d:630597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.