IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i18p9433-d630428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blended Care in In-Patient Acute Psychiatric Care. The Example of a Group Training for Social Competences in Adults—A Pretest–Posttest Feasibility Study

Author

Listed:
  • Eileen Bendig

    (Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    Shared first authorship.)

  • Ann-Marie Küchler

    (Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    Shared first authorship.)

  • Harald Baumeister

    (Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany)

  • Thomas Becker

    (Department of Psychiatry II, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm University, 89312 Ulm, Germany)

Abstract

Introduction: Deficits in social skills can be an important modulating factor in the development and progress of various mental disorders. However, limited resources in inpatient care often impede effective social skills training. This study investigates the feasibility of a blended group training for social skills (SST) in an inpatient psychiatric setting. Methods and Analysis: For this one-group pretest–posttest trial, inpatients with a diagnosed mental disorder were recruited. Participation in the blended SST lasted four weeks and took place within usual inpatient psychiatric care. The blended intervention comprised four face-to-face group sessions and three complementary online modules within four weeks. Assessments took place before (t1) and after (t2) the training. Feasibility outcomes (use, acceptance, satisfaction, implementability into usual psychiatric inpatient care) and effectiveness outcomes regarding social skills were assessed. Results: N = 15 participants were recruited. Most patients completed all questionnaires (93%) and all modules of the blended SST concept (60%). All participants (100%) would recommend the blended intervention to a friend. Regarding social skills, exploratory analyses revealed a non-significant medium-sized effect (Cohen’s d = 0.5 95%CI 0.3 to 1.25, p = 0.08). Discussion: This trial shows that a blended care SST is feasible for the use in acute psychiatric inpatient care setting. Although the wards were acute, with high turnover and change of inpatients, 60% of participants were treated per protocol over four weeks. Overall, the evidence on blended care concepts in psychiatric care settings is extremely poor to date. Hence, this trial should encourage intensified blended inpatient psychiatric care research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eileen Bendig & Ann-Marie Küchler & Harald Baumeister & Thomas Becker, 2021. "Blended Care in In-Patient Acute Psychiatric Care. The Example of a Group Training for Social Competences in Adults—A Pretest–Posttest Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9433-:d:630428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9433/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/18/9433/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Crawford & Jay Spence & Tali Lovegrove & Edman Tam & Daniel Collins & Samuel B. Harvey & Mark Deady, 2023. "Pilot Trial of Workable: A Therapist-Supported Digital Program for Injured Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:18:p:9433-:d:630428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.