IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p8993-d622649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Issues in the Transition from NAFLD to MAFLD: The Experience of the Plinio Study

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Baratta

    (I Clinica Medica, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Contribute equally.)

  • Domenico Ferro

    (I Clinica Medica, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Contribute equally.)

  • Daniele Pastori

    (Emergency Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Alessandra Colantoni

    (I Clinica Medica, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Nicholas Cocomello

    (I Clinica Medica, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Mattia Coronati

    (I Clinica Medica, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco Angelico

    (Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Co-seniors authors.)

  • Maria Del Ben

    (I Clinica Medica, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
    Co-seniors authors.)

Abstract

Metabolic associated fatty liver diseases (MAFLD) definition was proposed to identify fatty liver condition associated to metabolic disorders and to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to explore the effect of the application of the new MAFLD criteria on a pre-existing cohort of NAFLD patients. The consequences of the reclassification were investigated by applying the MAFLD criteria to a prospective cohort (The Plinio Study) of dysmetabolic patients examined for the presence of NAFLD. In the Plinio cohort, 795 patients had NAFLD and 767 of them (96.5%) were reclassified as MAFLD patients. Out of these, 94.9% had overweight/obesity or diabetes, while the remaining were lean and had metabolic dysregulation defined by the presence of at least two metabolic risk abnormalities. By contrast, 3.5% of the NAFLD patients were reclassified as no-MAFLD due to the absence of overweight/obesity, diabetes, or metabolic risk abnormalities. The only significant difference between the NAFLD and MAFLD groups was the higher prevalence of subjects with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 in the latter (88.6% vs. 92%; p = 0.018). In the cohort, 68 subjects were defined as “lean NAFLD”. Of these, 40 were reclassified as MAFLD and 28 as no-MAFLD. In conclusion, when applying MAFLD criteria to the Plinio cohort, there is a substantial overlap between NAFLD and MAFLD diagnosis. However, some specific subgroups of patients, such as those currently defined as lean NAFLD, were excluded by the new MAFLD definition.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Baratta & Domenico Ferro & Daniele Pastori & Alessandra Colantoni & Nicholas Cocomello & Mattia Coronati & Francesco Angelico & Maria Del Ben, 2021. "Open Issues in the Transition from NAFLD to MAFLD: The Experience of the Plinio Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8993-:d:622649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8993/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8993/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8993-:d:622649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.