IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i17p8927-d621328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Performance and Optimal Cut-Off Points of Blood Pressure for Identifying Arteriosclerosis among Adults in Eastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Yu

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Jiaxiang Yan

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Chen Yang

    (Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC H2W 1S4, Canada)

  • Yanan Gao

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Aiwen Wang

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

  • Huiming Huang

    (Faculty of Sport Science, Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the predictive performance and establish optimal cut-off points of blood pressure for identifying arteriosclerosis in eastern Chinese adults. Brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was utilized to evaluate arteriosclerosis. The predictive performance of blood pressure for arteriosclerosis was determined by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics; the optimal blood pressure cut-off points were determined by Youden’s index. A logistic regression model was used to acquire the odds ratio (OR) of blood pressure for arteriosclerosis. The AUCs of blood pressure for identifying arteriosclerosis were 0.868 (95%CI: 0.860–0.875) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 0.835 (95%CI: 0.827–0.843) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), both p < 0.01. The AUCs of women were higher than that of men (0.903 vs. 0.819 for SBP; 0.847 vs. 0.806 for DBP; Z test p < 0.05). The AUCs in the 18–39.9-years group were higher than that in the 40–59.9-years and 60–84-years groups (0.894 vs. 0.842 and 0.818 for SBP; 0.889 vs. 0.818 and 0.759 for DBP; Z test p < 0.05). The total optimal cut-off points of blood pressure for predicting arteriosclerosis were 123.5/73.5 mmHg (SBP/DBP) overall; 123.5/73.5 and 126.5/79.5 mmHg for women and men, respectively; and 120.5/73.5, 123.5/76.5, and 126.5/75.5 mmHg for 18–39.9-years, 40–59.9-years, and 60–84-years groups, respectively. Blood pressure indexes had a high predictive performance for identifying arteriosclerosis with the optimal cut-off point of 123.5/73.5 mmHg (SBP/DBP) in eastern Chinese adults. Women or the younger population have a higher predictive performance and lower cut-off points to identify arteriosclerosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Yu & Jiaxiang Yan & Chen Yang & Yanan Gao & Aiwen Wang & Huiming Huang, 2021. "Predictive Performance and Optimal Cut-Off Points of Blood Pressure for Identifying Arteriosclerosis among Adults in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8927-:d:621328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/17/8927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaohan Li & Junwu Yu & Jianjuan Bai & Huiming Huang & Shanshan Ying & Aiwen Wang & Ping Wang, 2023. "Interaction Between Obesity and Hypertension on Arteriosclerosis in Chinese Urban Adults: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(3), pages 629-638, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:17:p:8927-:d:621328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.