IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8848-d619483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain Neuroscience Education Combined with Therapeutic Exercises Provides Added Benefit in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain

Author

Listed:
  • Norollah Javdaneh

    (Department of Biomechanics and Sports Injuries, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Tehran 14911-15719, Iran)

  • Atle Hole Saeterbakken

    (Department of Sport, Food and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Education, Culture and Sport, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 6851 Sogndal, Norway)

  • Arash Shams

    (Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Boroujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd 6915136111, Iran)

  • Amir Hossein Barati

    (Department of Health and Exercise Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran)

Abstract

Background: Chronic neck pain is common in the adult general population. Although the etiology of chronic neck pain is under debate, it is clear that chronic neck pain is multifactorial, with both physical and psychosocial contributors. Objective: To determine whether adding pain neuroscience education (PNE) to therapeutic exercises improved their pain–disability index, pain catastrophizing, fear–avoidance beliefs, and pain self-efficacy in subjects with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Methods: This study was a three-arm randomized control trial. Seventy-two patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain were allocated to three groups: therapeutic exercises alone (n = 24), combined (therapeutic exercises + PNE; (n = 24), and a control group (n = 24). Each program took place three times a week, lasting for six weeks. The disability index, pain catastrophizing, fear–avoidance beliefs, and pain self-efficacy measured by the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Fear–Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), respectively. Participants were assessed before and after the six-week intervention, and there was no further follow-up. Results: For the outcomes NPAD, PSC, and FABQ, combined intervention demonstrated more significant improvements than therapeutic exercises alone ( p ≤ 0.05), whereas no differences were observed between the two intervention groups for PSEQ ( p = 0.99). In addition, significant differences were favoring experimental groups versus control for all outcomes ( p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Therapeutic exercises combined with pain neuroscience education reduced the pain–disability index, pain catastrophizing, and fear–avoidance beliefs more than therapeutic exercises alone in patients with chronic neck pain. For pain self-efficacy, there was no statistically significant difference between the two intervention groups; however, the combined group had a more significant effect than therapeutic exercises alone. Further studies with longer periods and follow-up are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Norollah Javdaneh & Atle Hole Saeterbakken & Arash Shams & Amir Hossein Barati, 2021. "Pain Neuroscience Education Combined with Therapeutic Exercises Provides Added Benefit in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8848-:d:619483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. César O. Ramírez-García & Danny J. Lluguay-Quispillo & Jorge D. Inga-Lafebre & María F. Cuenca-Lozano & Rosa M. Ojeda-Zambrano & Carmen C. Cárdenas-Baque, 2023. "Musculoskeletal Disorders in Primary School Teachers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8848-:d:619483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.