Author
Listed:
- Jun-Xian Wang
(Centre for Environmental Risk Management and Remediation of Soil and Groundwater, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
These authors contribute equally to this work.)
- Da-Mao Xu
(Centre for Environmental Risk Management and Remediation of Soil and Groundwater, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China
These authors contribute equally to this work.)
- Rong-Bing Fu
(Centre for Environmental Risk Management and Remediation of Soil and Groundwater, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China)
- Jia-Peng Chen
(State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
Abstract
Despite recent studies have investigated the strong influences of smelting activities on heavy metal contamination in the soil environment, little studies have been conducted on the current information about the potential environmental risks posed by toxic heavy metals in smelting contaminated sites. In the present study, a combination of the bioavailability, speciation, and release kinetics of toxic heavy metals in the indigenous zinc smelting contaminated soil were reliably used as an effective tool to support site risk assessment. The bioavailability results revealed that the bioavailable metal concentrations were intrinsically dependent on the types of chemical extractants. Interestingly, 0.02 mol/L EDTA + 0.5 mol/L CH 3 COONH 4 was found to be the best extractant, which extracted 30.21% of Cu, 31.54% of Mn, 2.39% of Ni and 28.89% of Zn, respectively. The sequential extraction results suggested that Cd, Pb, and Zn were the most mobile elements, which would pose the potential risks to the environment. The correlation of metal bioavailability with their fractionation implied that the exchangeable metal fractions were easily extracted by CaCl 2 and Mehlich 1, while the carbonate and organic bound metal fractions could be extracted by EDTA and DTPA with stronger chelating ability. Moreover, the kinetic modeling results suggested that the chemical desorption mechanism might be the major factor controlling heavy metal release. These results could provide some valuable references for the risk assessment and management of heavy metals in the smelting contaminated sites.
Suggested Citation
Jun-Xian Wang & Da-Mao Xu & Rong-Bing Fu & Jia-Peng Chen, 2021.
"Bioavailability Assessment of Heavy Metals Using Various Multi-Element Extractants in an Indigenous Zinc Smelting Contaminated Site, Southwestern China,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8560-:d:613896
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Atanas Atanasov & Ivaylo Hristakov & Gergana Kuncheva & Milan Koszel & Veselin Dochev, 2023.
"Assessment of heavy metals in soil, oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and honey,"
Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 400-407.
- Francesco Arfelli & Cristian Tosi & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2024.
"Life Cycle Assessment of a Wood Biomass Gasification Plant and Implications for Syngas and Biochar Utilization,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8560-:d:613896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.