IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8464-d612067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in Social Determinants of Health between Urban Indigenous Migrants and Non-Indigenous People in North-Eastern Mexico: An Analysis to Prioritize

Author

Listed:
  • Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico)

  • Brenda Mayela Esqueda-Eguía

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico)

  • Ana María Salinas-Martínez

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico
    Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Nuevo León 64360, Mexico)

  • María Natividad Ávila-Ortiz

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico)

  • Ana Elisa Castro-Sánchez

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico)

  • Adriana Zambrano-Moreno

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico)

  • Karina Janett Hernández-Ruiz

    (Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León 66455, Mexico)

Abstract

The degree to which social determinants of health differ between indigenous migrants and non-indigenous people born and raised locally is currently unknown. We compared social determinants of health between indigenous migrants and non-indigenous people from urban north-eastern Mexico. Additionally, we ranked priorities for addressing the negative social determinants of health. This was a population-based comparative cross-sectional study ( n = 235 indigenous migrants and 168 non-indigenous people). A two-stage non-random sampling was carried out from June to August of 2019. Heads of households ≥18 years and those with the ability to communicate in Spanish were recruited house by house. Structural and intermediary determinants of health were identified according to the World Health Organization Conceptual Framework and priorities were ranked using Z-scores. Being a migrant indigenous increased 1.6 times the odds of low education (95% CI = 1.1, 2.4). In addition, the migrant indigenous status increased the odds of poor housing, unhealthy behaviour and low social cohesion ( p < 0.05). Housing, behaviours and health service accessibility were top priorities for indigenous migrants and structural determinants for non-indigenous people. The findings show that the right to access the social determinants of health has not yet been guaranteed for indigenous communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgina Mayela Núñez-Rocha & Brenda Mayela Esqueda-Eguía & Ana María Salinas-Martínez & María Natividad Ávila-Ortiz & Ana Elisa Castro-Sánchez & Adriana Zambrano-Moreno & Karina Janett Hernández-Ruiz, 2021. "Differences in Social Determinants of Health between Urban Indigenous Migrants and Non-Indigenous People in North-Eastern Mexico: An Analysis to Prioritize," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8464-:d:612067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Dickes & Marie Valentova & Monique Borsenberger, 2010. "Construct Validation and Application of a Common Measure of Social Cohesion in 33 European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 98(3), pages 451-473, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andréasson, Hannes & Elert, Niklas & Karlson, Nils, 2013. "Does Social Cohesion Really Promote Reforms?," Ratio Working Papers 211, The Ratio Institute.
    2. Gaël Giraud & Cécile Renouard & Hélène L'Huillier & Raphaële de La Martinière & Camille Sutter, 2012. "Relational Capability: A Multidimensional Approach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00827690, HAL.
    3. Sung-Geun Kim, 2023. "What can we talk about social cohesion in Korea? An item response theory approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2409-2427, June.
    4. Marek Walesiak & Grażyna Dehnel, 2023. "A Measurement of Social Cohesion in Poland’s NUTS2 Regions in the Period 2010–2019 by Applying Dynamic Relative Taxonomy to Interval-Valued Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Gianmaria Bottoni, 2018. "A Multilevel Measurement Model of Social Cohesion," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 835-857, April.
    6. Silke Goubin, 2018. "Is Inequality a Latent Construct? An Assessment of Economic Inequality Indicators and Their Relation with Social Cohesion in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 21-40, February.
    7. Marie Valentova, 2016. "How Do Traditional Gender Roles Relate to Social Cohesion? Focus on Differences Between Women and Men," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 153-178, May.
    8. Soumi Muhuri & Sanghamitra Basu, 2018. "Developing Residential Social Cohesion Index for High-Rise Group Housing Complexes in India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 923-947, June.
    9. Gianmaria Bottoni, 2018. "Validation of a social cohesion theoretical framework: a multiple group SEM strategy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1081-1102, May.
    10. Oscar A. Martínez-Martínez & Araceli Ramírez-López & Anidelys Rodríguez-Brito, 2020. "Validation of a Multidimensional Social Cohesion Scale: A Case in Urban Areas of Mexico," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(3), pages 778-808, August.
    11. Paul Dickes & Marie Valentova, 2013. "Construction, Validation and Application of the Measurement of Social Cohesion in 47 European Countries and Regions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 827-846, September.
    12. David Schiefer & Jolanda Noll, 2017. "The Essentials of Social Cohesion: A Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 579-603, June.
    13. FLEURY Charles, 2011. "Travail et cohésion sociale," LISER Working Paper Series 2011-16, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    14. Marek Walesiak & Grażyna Dehnel, 2020. "The Measurement of Social Cohesion at Province Level in Poland Using Metric and Interval-Valued Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Carlo Klein, 2013. "Social Capital or Social Cohesion: What Matters For Subjective Well-Being?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 891-911, February.
    16. Peter Huber & Thomas Leoni & Hans Pitlik, 2013. "Reforming Welfare States. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 1," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47022, April.
    17. Hannes Andréasson & Niklas Elert & Nils Karlson, 2013. "Does Social Cohesion Really Promote Reforms? WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 33," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46919, April.
    18. Sarita Silveira & Martin Hecht & Hannah Matthaeus & Mazda Adli & Manuel C. Voelkle & Tania Singer, 2022. "Coping with the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perceived Changes in Psychological Vulnerability, Resilience and Social Cohesion before, during and after Lockdown," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8464-:d:612067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.