IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8340-d609794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Work-Related Stress among Rescue Workers in Traumatic Mass-Casualty Disasters

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Long Chen

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan
    School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Chii Tzeng

    (School of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan)

  • En Chao

    (Department of Medical Affairs, SongShan branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei 105, Taiwan)

  • Hui-Hsun Chiang

    (School of Nursing, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan)

Abstract

Rescue workers are a population at high-risk for mental problems as they are exposed to work-related stress from confrontation with traumatic events when responding to a disaster. A reliable measure is needed to assess rescue workers’ work-related stress from their surveillance of a disaster scene to help prevent severe PTSD and depressive symptoms. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Work-Related Stress Scale (WRSS) designed to measure stress in rescue workers after responding to traumatic mass-casualty events. An exploratory sequential mixed methods procedure was employed. The qualitative phase of the item generation component involved in-depth interviews of 7 experienced rescue workers from multiple specialties who had taken part in 1 or 2 mass-casualty events: the 2018 Hualien earthquake or the 2016 Tainan earthquake. In the quantitative phase, a modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus ratings by the same 7 raters on the items and to assess content validity. Construct validity was determined by confirmatory factor analysis using a broader sample of 293 rescue workers who had taken part in 1 of 2 mass-casualty events: the 2018 Hualien earthquake or the 2021 Hualien train derailment. The final WRSS consists of 16 items total and 4 subscales: Physical Demands, Psychological Response, Environmental Interruption, and Leadership, with aggregated alphas of 0.74–0.88. The WRSS was found to have psychometric integrity as a measure of stress in rescue workers after responding to a disaster.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Long Chen & Wen-Chii Tzeng & En Chao & Hui-Hsun Chiang, 2021. "Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Work-Related Stress among Rescue Workers in Traumatic Mass-Casualty Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8340-:d:609794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8340/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8340/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trond Heir & Elise Hansen Stokke & Karina Pauline Tvenge, 2021. "The Role of Workplace on Work Participation and Sick Leave after a Terrorist Attack: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Tomoko Kamijo & Teruomi Tsukahara & Akihito Shimazu & Tetsuo Nomiyama, 2020. "Risk Factors for Duty-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Police Officers in the Mt. Ontake Eruption Disaster-Support Task Force," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8340-:d:609794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.