IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8094-d605328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Safety Analysis of Red Mud-Based Cemented Backfill on Groundwater

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Li

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yulin Zhang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Ru Feng

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Haoxuan Yu

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Jilong Pan

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Jiwei Bian

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

As one of the main industrial solid wastes, there are a large number of free alkaloids, chemically bound alkaloids, fluoride, and heavy metal ions in Bayer process red mud (BRM), which are difficult to remove and easily pollute groundwater as a result of open storage. In order to realize the large-scale industrial application of BRM as a backfilling aggregate for underground mining and simultaneously avoid polluting groundwater, the material characteristics of BRM were analyzed through physical, mechanical, and chemical composition tests. The optimum cement–sand ratio and solid mass concentration of the backfilling were obtained based on several mixture proportion tests. According to the results of bleeding, soaking, and toxic leaching experiments, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the environmental impact of BRM on groundwater. The results show that chemically bound alkaloids that remained in BRM reacted with Ca 2+ in PO 42.5 cement, slowed down the solidification speed, and reduced the early strength of red mud-based cemented backfill (RMCB). The hydration products in RMCB, such as AFT and C-S-H gel, had significant encapsulation, solidification, and precipitation inhibition effects on contaminants, which could reduce the contents of inorganic contaminants in soaking water by 26.8% to 93.8% and the leaching of toxic heavy metal ions by 57.1% to 73.3%. As shown by the results of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, the degree of pollution of the RMCB in bleeding water belonged to a medium grade Ⅲ, while that in the soaking water belonged to a low grade II. The bleeding water was diluted by 50–100 times to reach grade I after flowing into the water sump and could be totally recycled for drilling and backfilling, thus causing negligible effects on the groundwater environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Li & Yulin Zhang & Ru Feng & Haoxuan Yu & Jilong Pan & Jiwei Bian, 2021. "Environmental Safety Analysis of Red Mud-Based Cemented Backfill on Groundwater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8094-:d:605328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haoxuan Yu & Shuai Li & Lifeng Yu & Xinmin Wang, 2022. "The Recent Progress China Has Made in Green Mine Construction, Part II: Typical Examples of Green Mines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Shuai Li & Lifeng Yu & Wanjun Jiang & Haoxuan Yu & Xinmin Wang, 2022. "The Recent Progress China Has Made in Green Mine Construction, Part I: Mining Groundwater Pollution and Sustainable Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8094-:d:605328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.