IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p8025-d604069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Targets for Interventions to Increase Uptake and Use of Hearing Protection in Noisy Recreational Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Michael T. Loughran

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Christopher J. Plack

    (Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, UK)

  • Christopher J. Armitage

    (Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
    Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9QN, UK
    NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

Interventions to increase hearing protection behaviours within noisy recreational settings are limited by the lack of an underpinning evidence base. The aim of the present study was to identify targets for interventions in a population exposed to recreational noise, including those who had used hearing protection (ever-performers) versus those who had not (never-performers). A cross-sectional survey was administered to 185 UK adults who had been involved in noisy recreational activities. Participants had an average age of 36.79 years; the majority were women (68.1%), from a white ethnic background (87.6%), and with non-manual occupations (75.7%). Using Chi-square, MANOVA and ANOVA, we looked for differences in sociodemographic variables and variables from the capabilities, opportunities and motivations model of behaviour change (COM-B) between ever- and never-performers. Ever-performers were more likely to be younger ( p < 0.050), men ( p < 0.050), and in a manual occupation ( p < 0.050) compared to never-performers. Although the two groups felt capable and reported similar opportunities to use hearing protection, never-performers lacked automatic motivation ( p < 0.001) and reflective motivation ( p < 0.001) compared to ever-performers. For the first time, the present study identifies potential groups at whom hearing protection interventions might be targeted and what those interventions may contain. Further work is required to develop interventions targeted at older people, women and those in non-manual occupations. Lack of motivation is a key concern, and further work that uses specific theoretical frameworks, such as the PRIME (Plans, Responses, Impulses, Motives, and Evaluations) theory of motivation, may shed light on the kinds of interventions that are needed to boost hearing protection use effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael T. Loughran & Christopher J. Plack & Christopher J. Armitage, 2021. "Identifying Targets for Interventions to Increase Uptake and Use of Hearing Protection in Noisy Recreational Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8025-:d:604069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8025/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/8025/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael T. Loughran & Samuel Couth & Christopher J. Plack & Christopher J. Armitage, 2021. "Identifying Targets for Interventions to Increase Earplug Use in Noisy Recreational Settings: A Qualitative Interview Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:8025-:d:604069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.