IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7136-d588006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Physical Guidance on Learning a Tracking Task in Children with Cerebral Palsy

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Nobari

    (Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
    HEME Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain)

  • Elham Azimzadeh

    (Department of Behavioural, Cognitive and Technology Sciences in Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 198396-3113, Iran)

  • Hamidollah Hassanlouei

    (Department of Behavioural, Cognitive and Technology Sciences in Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 198396-3113, Iran)

  • Georgian Badicu

    (Department of Physical Education and Special Motricity, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500068 Brasov, Romania)

  • Jorge Pérez-Gómez

    (HEME Research Group, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Caceres, Spain)

  • Luca Paolo Ardigò

    (Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, School of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Verona, 37131 Verona, Italy)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of physical guidance (PG) frequency on learning a tracking task in children with hemiplegic spastic cerebral palsy (CP). For this purpose, 25 children, aged 7–15 years with CP affecting the left side of the body, who were classified in levels II–III of Manual Abilities Classification System (MACS) and levels III–IV of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), were recruited from 10 clinical centers. A pre-test including two blocks of 12 trials of the tracking task without any PG was performed by all participants, after that they were assigned into five homogenous groups (with 100%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and 0% of PG) through blocked randomization according to their age. All participants involved in an intervention consisted of eight sessions (four blocks of 12 trials in each session) practicing a tracking task. The 0% PG group received no PG, the 25% PG group received PG for three trials, the 50% PG group received PG for six trials, the 75% PG group received PG for nine trials, and the 100% PG group received PG for all twelve trials. PG consisted of placing the experimenter’s hand around the child’s less-involved hand guiding to stay on the track and complete the task. Learning was inferred by acquisition and delayed retention tests. The results showed that the higher frequency of PG led to more accurate performance during practice phase. However, the group that received 75% PG had significantly better performance compared to the other groups in the retention phase. It is concluded that optimum level of PG, about 75% of trials, can be helpful for learning a tracking task in children with spastic hemiplegic CP, supporting the challenge point framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Nobari & Elham Azimzadeh & Hamidollah Hassanlouei & Georgian Badicu & Jorge Pérez-Gómez & Luca Paolo Ardigò, 2021. "Effect of Physical Guidance on Learning a Tracking Task in Children with Cerebral Palsy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7136-:d:588006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7136-:d:588006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.