IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7104-d587511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Staff and Students’ Attitudes towards a Completely Smoke-Free Campus: Shifting Social Norms and Organisational Culture for Health Promotion

Author

Listed:
  • Marguerite C. Sendall

    (Faculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia)

  • Lauren Fox

    (Faculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia)

  • Darren Wraith

    (Faculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia)

Abstract

A large university in Queensland, Australia with a diverse staff and student community introduced a campus wide smoke-free policy in 2016. The purpose of this enquiry was to understand attitudes about a new smoke-free policy, its potential impact and the shift in social norms and organizational culture to inform the next phase of implementation. An electronic survey was distributed to all staff and students approximately 12 weeks after the smoke-free policy was implemented. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions about demographics, smoking behaviour, attitudes towards smoking and tobacco control, awareness of the smoke-free policy, and attitudes towards the effect of a completely smoke-free campus on quality of life, learning and enrolment. The survey was completed by 641 university staff and students. Respondents reported seeking out (80.4%) and socialising in smoke-free environments (86.6%) and supported smoke-free buildings (96.1%), indoor areas (91.6%), and outdoor areas (79%). The results revealed overwhelming support for a completely smoke-free campus (83%) and minority support for designated smoking areas (31%). Overall, respondents reflected positively towards a campus wide smoke-free policy. These findings suggest Queensland’s early adoption of tobacco control laws influenced the social environment, de-normalised smoking, changed behaviour, preference for smoke-free environments and shifted social norms. These findings provide convincing evidence for organisational change and suggest health promotion policy makers should progress the implementation of smoke-free policies nationally across the higher education sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Marguerite C. Sendall & Lauren Fox & Darren Wraith, 2021. "University Staff and Students’ Attitudes towards a Completely Smoke-Free Campus: Shifting Social Norms and Organisational Culture for Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7104-:d:587511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheila Keogan & Tamara Alonso & Salome Sunday & Joan Hanafin & Olena Tigova & Esteve Fernandez & Maria Jose Lopez & Silvano Gallus & Sean Semple & Anna Tzortzi & Roberto Boffi & Giuseppe Gorini & Ange, 2023. "Particle Exposure Hazards of Visiting Outdoor Smoking Areas for Patients with Asthma or COPD Even in EU Countries with Comprehensive Smokefree Laws," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Ken Polin & Tan Yigitcanlar & Tracy Washington & Mark Limb, 2024. "Unpacking Smart Campus Assessment: Developing a Framework via Narrative Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7104-:d:587511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.