IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p7034-d586413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Section—A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Borys

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Beata Potręć-Studzińska

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Paweł Kutnik

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Justyna Sysiak-Sławecka

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Elżbieta Rypulak

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Tomasz Gęca

    (Department of Obstetrics and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Kwaśniewska

    (Department of Obstetrics and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Mirosław Czuczwar

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

  • Paweł Piwowarczyk

    (II Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Lublin, Ul. Staszica 16, 20-081 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

Acute pain intensity related to cesarean section (CS) may be extensive and is often underestimated. This may influence mothers’ quality of life and their children’s development. Regional analgesia techniques that include transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have proven their efficacy in the postoperative period after CS. Although several randomized controlled studies and one meta-analysis have investigated the utility of TAPB and QLB in the reduction of acute and chronic pain after CS, only one study directly compared both types of regional blocks and revealed superiority of QLB over TAPB. Our study aimed to reevaluate the effectiveness of transversus TAPB and QLB in controlling acute postoperative pain after CS. We recruited 197 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomized to receive either TAPB or QLB after CS. The acute postoperative pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after the operation. No significant difference in acute postoperative pain intensity between the groups was found. The patients who received TAPB had a higher demand for supplemental morphine injections ( p < 0.039). In our study, none of the evaluated regional blocks demonstrated an advantage over the other regarding acute postoperative pain management.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Borys & Beata Potręć-Studzińska & Paweł Kutnik & Justyna Sysiak-Sławecka & Elżbieta Rypulak & Tomasz Gęca & Anna Kwaśniewska & Mirosław Czuczwar & Paweł Piwowarczyk, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Section—A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7034-:d:586413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7034/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/7034/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:7034-:d:586413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.