IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p6810-d581818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten Thousand-Fold Higher than Acceptable Bacterial Loads Detected in Kenyan Hospital Environments: Targeted Approaches to Reduce Contamination Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Erick Odoyo

    (United States Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 606-00621, Kenya)

  • Daniel Matano

    (Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi P.O. Box 54848-00200, Kenya)

  • Martin Georges

    (United States Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 606-00621, Kenya)

  • Fredrick Tiria

    (United States Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 606-00621, Kenya)

  • Samuel Wahome

    (Independent Researcher, Nairobi P.O. Box 64-20300, Kenya)

  • Cecilia Kyany’a

    (United States Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 606-00621, Kenya)

  • Lillian Musila

    (United States Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 606-00621, Kenya)

Abstract

Microbial monitoring of hospital surfaces can help identify target areas for improved infection prevention and control (IPCs). This study aimed to determine the levels and variations in the bacterial contamination of high-touch surfaces in five Kenyan hospitals and identify the contributing modifiable risk factors. A total of 559 high-touch surfaces in four departments identified as high risk of hospital-acquired infections were sampled and examined for bacterial levels of contamination using standard bacteriological culture methods. Bacteria were detected in 536/559 (95.9%) surfaces. The median bacterial load on all sampled surfaces was 6.0 × 10 4 CFU/cm 2 (interquartile range (IQR); 8.0 × 10 3 –1.0 × 10 6 ). Only 55/559 (9.8%) of the sampled surfaces had acceptable bacterial loads, <5 CFU/cm². Cleaning practices, such as daily washing of patient sheets, incident rate ratio (IRR) = 0.10 [95% CI: 0.04–0.24], providing hand wash stations, IRR = 0.25 [95% CI: 0.02–0.30], having running water, IRR = 0.19 [95% CI: 0.08–0.47] and soap for handwashing IRR = 0.21 [95% CI: 0.12–0.39] each significantly lowered bacterial loads. Transporting dirty linen in a designated container, IRR = 72.11 [95% CI: 20.22–257.14], increased bacterial loads. The study hospitals can best reduce the bacterial loads by improving waste-handling protocols, cleaning high-touch surfaces five times a day and providing soap at the handwash stations.

Suggested Citation

  • Erick Odoyo & Daniel Matano & Martin Georges & Fredrick Tiria & Samuel Wahome & Cecilia Kyany’a & Lillian Musila, 2021. "Ten Thousand-Fold Higher than Acceptable Bacterial Loads Detected in Kenyan Hospital Environments: Targeted Approaches to Reduce Contamination Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6810-:d:581818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6810/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6810/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6810-:d:581818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.