IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i13p6803-d581582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Young Refugees: Comparison of Questionnaire Data with and without Involvement of an Interpreter

Author

Listed:
  • Lauritz Rudolf Floribert Müller

    (Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
    Joint first authors.)

  • Johanna Unterhitzenberger

    (Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
    Joint first authors.)

  • Svenja Wintersohl

    (Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany)

  • Rita Rosner

    (Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany)

  • Julia König

    (Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany)

Abstract

Background : The substantial number of young refugees who have arrived in Europe since 2015 requires rapid screening to identify those in need of treatment. However, translated versions of screening measures are not always available, necessitating the support of interpreters. The Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) is a validated questionnaire for posttraumatic stress symptoms. Here, we report on the psychometric properties of the CATS in a sample of young refugees as a function of interpreter involvement. Methods: A total of N = 145 ( M age = 16.8, SD = 1.54; 93% male) were assessed with the CATS, with half of the screenings conducted with and half without interpreters. Post hoc analyses included calculating internal consistency using Cronbach’s α . We used confirmative factor analysis to investigate the factor structure. Results: The CATS total scale showed good reliability (α = 0.84). Differences in psychometric properties between the interpreter vs. the no interpreter group were minor and tended to be in favor of the interpreter group. Results of a confirmatory factor analysis were acceptable after the exclusion of items with low item-scale correlations. Conclusions: The sample and the administration of the assessment represent the situation of young refugees in Germany, where resources are low and translated versions not always available. The CATS may be a helpful screening tool for clinicians working with young refugees, even when administered with an interpreter. Limitations include the post hoc design of the analysis without randomization of participants and the lack of a third comparison group using translated questionnaire versions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauritz Rudolf Floribert Müller & Johanna Unterhitzenberger & Svenja Wintersohl & Rita Rosner & Julia König, 2021. "Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Young Refugees: Comparison of Questionnaire Data with and without Involvement of an Interpreter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-7, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6803-:d:581582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/13/6803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:13:p:6803-:d:581582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.