IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6593-d577820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Walking Cadence during Moderate-Intensity Physical Activity in Pregnant Women

Author

Listed:
  • Mallory Marshall

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • Beth Birchfield

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • Rebecca Rogers

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • Joyeuse Senga

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • McKenna Persch

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • Madison Currie

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • Daphne Schmid

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA)

  • Christopher Ballmann

    (Department of Kinesiology, Samford University, Lakeshore, AL 35229, USA
    FACSM.)

Abstract

Evidence has established that a cadence of 100 steps/min is indicative of the moderate intensity threshold of 3 metabolic equivalents (METs), but this has only been described in non-pregnant individuals. As metabolic alterations are well established during pregnancy, the purpose of this study was to determine if the walking cadence equivalent to 3 METs in pregnant women is similar to non-pregnant populations. Pregnant females ( n = 29; age = 30.3 ± 3.2 years, gestational age = 23.9 ± 6.6 weeks) in their second or third trimester (>12 weeks gestation) completed three stages of treadmill walking for 5 min at different standardized walking speeds: 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 miles per hour (mph). Oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR) were measured each minute and METs were calculated for each stage. Real-time continuous monitoring of walking cadence was evaluated by an OptoGait gait analysis system. Following the three standardized speed stages, participants completed an additional stage walking at a speed that elicited 100 steps/min; VO2 and HR were also collected. A one-sample t-test was used to compare MET values at each stage to the heuristic 3 MET cutoff, and Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between cadence and METs. Mean cadence increased linearly across the three stages (2.5 mph = 103.7 ± 4.5, 3.0 mph = 112.5 ± 5.3, and 3.5 mph = 120.4 ± 6.2 steps/min), as did METs (2.5 mph = 2.7 ± 1.7, 3.0 mph = 3.2 ± 0.8, and 3.5 mph = 4.3 ± 1.8 METs) regardless of trimester. The average treadmill speed at which women walked at 100 steps/min was 2.4 ± 0.4 mph which elicited an oxygen consumption of 9.5 mL•kg −1 •min −1 , or 2.7 ± 0.7 METs. There was no significant difference between METs at 3.0 mph and the conventional 3 MET cut point for moderate-intensity PA ( p < 0.05). There was a moderate and significant relationship between METs and cadence (2nd trimester: r = 0.51; 3rd trimester: r = 0.42). Current data indicate for the first time that the traditionally used 3 MET cutoff for moderate-intensity activity is appropriate for pregnant women despite metabolic alterations associated with pregnancy. This may have important implications for exercise prescription in pregnant populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mallory Marshall & Beth Birchfield & Rebecca Rogers & Joyeuse Senga & McKenna Persch & Madison Currie & Daphne Schmid & Christopher Ballmann, 2021. "Walking Cadence during Moderate-Intensity Physical Activity in Pregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-6, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6593-:d:577820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6593-:d:577820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.