IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i12p6206-d571067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of a Scorecard Tool for Assessing and Engaging Media on Responsible Reporting of Suicide-Related News in India

Author

Listed:
  • Lakshmi Vijayakumar

    (Department of Psychiatry, Voluntary Health Services and SNEHA Suicide Prevention Centre, Tamil Nadu 600017, India)

  • Manisha Shastri

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Tanya Nicole Fernandes

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Yash Bagra

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Aaryaman Pathare

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Arpita Patel

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Padam Jain

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Yesha Merchant

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

  • Gregory Armstrong

    (Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia)

  • Soumitra Pathare

    (Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune 411004, India)

Abstract

Background: Each year there are more than 800,000 deaths by suicide across the world, while India alone accounts for one third of female suicides and one fourth of male suicides worldwide. Responsible media reporting of suicide is an important suicide prevention intervention at the population level. There is sufficient evidence to show that the way suicide is reported and portrayed in the media can have a significant impact on individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Recognizing the important role of the media in suicide prevention, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidelines for responsible reporting of suicides by the media. The Press Council of India, in 2019 endorsed WHO’s guidelines for media reporting of suicides, however there is no evidence that the Indian media is complying with these guidelines. Methods: To encourage responsible media reporting, we developed a scorecard to assess and rate media reports on suicide. We reviewed several resource documents that contained guidelines on responsible reporting of suicide. After consulting with a team of experts, we arrived at a scorecard that consisted of 10 positive and 10 negative parameters. Results: We applied the scorecard to 1318 reports on suicide from 9 English language newspapers, with the highest readership in India between the dates of 1 April to 30 June 2020. For the articles analyzed, the average positive score across all newspapers was 1.32 and the average negative score was 3.31. Discussion: The scorecard can be a useful tool to assess media reports on suicide and provide metrics for the same. It can facilitate improved monitoring and engagement with media organizations, who can quickly check their own reporting compliance to the WHO guidelines and compare how well they are performing compared to their peers over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakshmi Vijayakumar & Manisha Shastri & Tanya Nicole Fernandes & Yash Bagra & Aaryaman Pathare & Arpita Patel & Padam Jain & Yesha Merchant & Gregory Armstrong & Soumitra Pathare, 2021. "Application of a Scorecard Tool for Assessing and Engaging Media on Responsible Reporting of Suicide-Related News in India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6206-:d:571067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6206/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/12/6206/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:12:p:6206-:d:571067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.