IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p6171-d570402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perceived Impact of The First UK COVID-19 Lockdown on Companion Animal Welfare and Behaviour: A Mixed-Method Study of Associations with Owner Mental Health

Author

Listed:
  • Emily Shoesmith

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK)

  • Luciana Santos de Assis

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK)

  • Lion Shahab

    (Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK)

  • Elena Ratschen

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK)

  • Paul Toner

    (School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5BN, UK)

  • Dimitra Kale

    (Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 7HB, UK)

  • Catherine Reeve

    (School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5BN, UK)

  • Daniel S. Mills

    (School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK)

Abstract

Background: Companion animals may be a positive presence for their owners during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the welfare of a companion animal is strongly influenced by the behaviour of their owners, as well as their physical and social environment. We aimed to investigate the reported changes in companion animal welfare and behaviour and to examine the association between these changes and companion animal owners’ mental health. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey of UK residents over 18 years of age was conducted between April and June 2020 (n = 5926). The questionnaire included validated, bespoke items measuring outcomes related to mental health, human-animal bonds and reported changes in animal welfare and behaviour. The final item of the survey invited open-ended free-text responses, allowing participants to describe experiences associated with human-animal relationships during the first UK lockdown phase. Results: Animal owners made up 89.8% of the sample (n = 5323), of whom 67.3% reported changes in their animal’s welfare and behaviour during the first lockdown phase (n = 3583). These reported changes were reduced to a positive (0–7) and negative (0–5) welfare scale, following principal component analysis (PCA) of 17 items. Participants reported more positive changes for cats, whereas more negative changes were reported for dogs. Thematic analysis identified three main themes relating to the positive and negative impact on companion animals of the COVID-19 pandemic. Generalised linear models indicated that companion animal owners with poorer mental health scores pre-lockdown reported fewer negative changes in animal welfare and behaviour. However, companion animal owners with poorer mental health scores since lockdown reported more changes, both positive and negative, in animal welfare and behaviour. Conclusion: Our findings extend previous insights into perceived welfare and behaviour changes on a very limited range of species to a wider range of companion animals. Owner mental health status has a clear, albeit small, effect on companion animal welfare and behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily Shoesmith & Luciana Santos de Assis & Lion Shahab & Elena Ratschen & Paul Toner & Dimitra Kale & Catherine Reeve & Daniel S. Mills, 2021. "The Perceived Impact of The First UK COVID-19 Lockdown on Companion Animal Welfare and Behaviour: A Mixed-Method Study of Associations with Owner Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:6171-:d:570402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/6171/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/6171/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:6171-:d:570402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.