Author
Listed:
- Syed Imran Ghouri
(Department of Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Mohammad Asim
(Clinical Research, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Fuad Mustafa
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Ahad Kanbar
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Mohamed Ellabib
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Hisham Al Jogol
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Mohammed Muneer
(Department of Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Nuri Abdurraheim
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Atirek Pratap Goel
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Husham Abdelrahman
(Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Hassan Al-Thani
(Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar)
- Ayman El-Menyar
(Clinical Research, Trauma and Vascular Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar
Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar)
Abstract
Background: Femur is the most fractured long bone in the body that often necessitates surgical fixation; however, data on the impact of the mechanism of injury (MOI), age, and timing of intervention are lacking in our region of the Arab Middle East. We aimed to describe the patterns, management, and outcome of traumatic femoral shaft fractures. Methods: A retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted for all trauma patients admitted with femoral shaft fractures between January 2012 and December 2015 at the only level 1 trauma center and tertiary hospital in the country. Data were analyzed and compared according to the time to intervention (intramedullary nailing; IMN), MOI, and age groups. Main outcomes included in-hospital complications and mortality. Results: A total of 605 hospitalized cases with femur fractures were reviewed. The mean age was 30.7 ± 16.2 years. The majority of fractures were unilateral (96.7%) and 91% were closed fractures. Three-fourths of fractures were treated by reamed intramedullary nailing (rIMN), antegrade in 80%. The pyriform fossa nails were used in 71.6% while trochanteric entry nails were used in 28.4%. Forty-five (8.9%) fractures were treated with an external fixator, 37 (6.1%) had conservative management. Traffic-related injuries occurred more in patients aged 14–30 years, whereas fall-related injuries were significantly higher in patients aged 31–59. Thirty-one patients (7.8%) had rIMN in less than 6 h post-injury, 106 (25.5%) had rIMN after 6–12 h and 267 (66.8%) had rIMN after more than 12 h. The implant type, duration of surgery, DVT prophylaxis, in-hospital complications, and mortality were comparable among the three treatment groups. Conclusions: In our center, the frequency of femoral fracture was 11%, and it mainly affected severely injured young males due to traffic-related collisions or falls. Further multicenter studies are needed to set a consensus for an appropriate management of femur fracture based on the MOI, location, and timing of injury.
Suggested Citation
Syed Imran Ghouri & Mohammad Asim & Fuad Mustafa & Ahad Kanbar & Mohamed Ellabib & Hisham Al Jogol & Mohammed Muneer & Nuri Abdurraheim & Atirek Pratap Goel & Husham Abdelrahman & Hassan Al-Thani & Ay, 2021.
"Patterns, Management, and Outcome of Traumatic Femur Fracture: Exploring the Experience of the Only Level 1 Trauma Center in Qatar,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5916-:d:566474
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5916-:d:566474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.