IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i11p5649-d561825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hospital Employees’ Well-Being Six Months after the COVID-19 Outbreak: Results from a Psychological Screening Program in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Lamiani

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy)

  • Lidia Borghi

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy)

  • Silvia Poli

    (Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy)

  • Katia Razzini

    (Prevention and Protection Service, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy)

  • Claudio Colosio

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
    Occupational Health Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy)

  • Elena Vegni

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
    Clinical Psychology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has taken a heavy toll on the mental well-being of healthcare workers. This study aims to describe a psychological screening program developed at a large University Hospital in Milan, Italy, and assess the psychological outcomes of employees and associated factors. A survey was electronically conducted among hospital employees between July and October 2020. Sociodemographic data, information about COVID-19 experience and three scales assessing anxiety (STAI-Y1), depression (HAM-D) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PCL-5) were collected. A total of 308 employees (80% women; mean age 45.1 years) responded: 16% physicians, 68% other healthcare professionals, and 16% administrative staff. Employees reported moderate/severe symptoms of anxiety (23%), depression (53%), and post-traumatic stress disorder (40%). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, having suffered a loss for COVID-19 in the personal context was independently associated with higher risk of moderate/severe anxiety (OR = 2.40; 95% CI 1.16–4.98), being female was associated with higher risk of moderate/severe depression (OR = 2.82; 95% CI 1.43–5.59), and having had a family member affected by COVID-19 was associated with higher risk of moderate/severe post-traumatic stress disorder (OR = 2.75; 95% CI 1.01–7.48). COVID-19 personal experience may have a profound impact on hospital workers’ mental health and should be considered in supportive interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Lamiani & Lidia Borghi & Silvia Poli & Katia Razzini & Claudio Colosio & Elena Vegni, 2021. "Hospital Employees’ Well-Being Six Months after the COVID-19 Outbreak: Results from a Psychological Screening Program in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5649-:d:561825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marina Ruxandra Oțelea & Agripina Rașcu & Cătălin Staicu & Lavinia Călugăreanu & Mădălina Ipate & Silvia Teodorescu & Ovidiu Persecă & Angelica Voinoiu & Andra Neamțu & Violeta Calotă & Dana Mateș, 2022. "Exhaustion in Healthcare Workers after the First Three Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Bernat-Carles Serdà & Maria Aymerich & Josefina Patiño-Masó & Mònica Cunill, 2021. "Mental Health Screening of Healthcare Professionals Who Are Candidates for Psychological Assistance during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:11:p:5649-:d:561825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.