IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5140-d553328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of an Annual Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge on Changing Step Counts: Findings from Four Years of Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Ailsa Niven

    (Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Institute of Sport, PE and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK)

  • Gemma Cathrine Ryde

    (Division of Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Guy Wilkinson

    (Division of Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

  • Carl Greenwood

    (Paths for All, Kintail House, Forthside Way, Stirling FK8 1QZ, UK)

  • Trish Gorely

    (Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Health Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Old Perth Road, Inverness IV3 5SQ, UK)

Abstract

Paths for All’s 8-week online Workplace Step Count Challenge (SCC) is a flagship program of Scotland’s National Walking Strategy. The aim of this study was to examine changes in step counts throughout the duration of the SCC, across four years of delivery. Participants were those who registered for the 2015–2018 SCCs, and reported demographic data at registration. Participants self-reported their device-measured step count for each day of the SCC. Following data screening, mean daily steps for each week were calculated. Linear mixed models (R nlme procedure), controlling for the within subject nature of the step count measure, were used to explore changes in steps over time. Gender and age group (<45 years; ≥45 years) were entered into a subsequent model. Separate models were created for each year of the SCC and for all years combined. Participants ( n = 10,183) were predominantly women (76.8%), aged <45 (54.6%) and ≥45 years. In general, steps increased each week compared to week 1 ( p < 0.001), with a significant increase evident at all but seven of 28 data points. Across the four years of SCC, the increase in steps at week 8 compared to week 1 ranged from 506 to 1223 steps per day, making a substantial contribution to the recommended physical activity levels for health. There was no consistent age or gender effect. The findings provide support for the continued investment in such workplace interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ailsa Niven & Gemma Cathrine Ryde & Guy Wilkinson & Carl Greenwood & Trish Gorely, 2021. "The Effectiveness of an Annual Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge on Changing Step Counts: Findings from Four Years of Delivery," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5140-:d:553328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5140/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5140/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Saadiq & Roy Valenzuela & Jing Wang & Zenong Yin & Deborah Parra-Medina & Jennifer Gay & Jennifer J. Salinas, 2021. "Walking Engagement in Mexican Americans Who Participated in a Community-Wide Step Challenge in El Paso, TX," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Gemma C. Ryde & Simone A. Tomaz & Krissi Sandison & Carl Greenwood & Paul Kelly, 2022. "Measuring Productivity, Perceived Stress and Work Engagement of a Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5140-:d:553328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.