IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5059-d552039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Nerve Block with Short-Acting Lidocaine in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenails

Author

Listed:
  • Beom Suk Kim

    (Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Eulji University, Daejeon 11759, Korea
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea)

  • Kyungho Kim

    (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, Daejeon 34059, Korea
    Samsung Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul 06351, Korea)

  • Jonathan Day

    (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA
    School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA)

  • Jesse Seilern Und Aspang

    (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA
    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA)

  • Jaeyoung Kim

    (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, Daejeon 34059, Korea
    Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA)

Abstract

Background: Digital nerve block (DB) is a commonly utilized anesthetic procedure in ingrown toenail surgery. However, severe procedure-related pain has been reported. Although the popliteal sciatic nerve block (PB) is widely accepted in foot and ankle surgery, its use in ingrown toenail surgery has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PB in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Methods: One-hundred-ten patients surgically treated for an ingrown toenail were enrolled. Sixty-six patients underwent DB, and 44 underwent PB. PB was performed under ultrasound-guidance via a 22-gauge needle with 15 mL of 1% lidocaine in the popliteal region. The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at two-time points: pain with skin penetration and pain with the solution injection. Time to sensory block, duration of sensory block, need for additional injections, and adverse events were recorded. Results: PB group demonstrated significantly lower procedure-related pain than the DB group. Time to sensory block was significantly longer in the PB group (20.8 ± 4.6 versus 6.5 ± 1.6 minutes). The sensory block duration was significantly longer in the PB group (187.9 ± 22.0 versus 106.5 ± 19.1 minutes). Additional injections were required in 16 (24.2%) DB cases, while no additional injections were required in PB cases. Four adverse events occurred in the DB group and two in the PB group. Conclusion: PB was a less painful anesthetic procedure associated with a longer sensory block duration and fewer repeat injections compared with DB. The result of this study implicates that PB can be an alternative anesthetic option in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails.

Suggested Citation

  • Beom Suk Kim & Kyungho Kim & Jonathan Day & Jesse Seilern Und Aspang & Jaeyoung Kim, 2021. "Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Nerve Block with Short-Acting Lidocaine in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenails," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5059-:d:552039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5059-:d:552039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.