IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5050-d551848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Personal Protective Equipment on Wildland Firefighters’ Physiological Response and Performance during the Pack Test

Author

Listed:
  • Belén Carballo-Leyenda

    (VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo

    (VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Fabio García-Heras

    (VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Pilar Sánchez-Collado

    (VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • José G. Villa-Vicente

    (VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Jose A. Rodríguez-Marroyo

    (VALFIS Research Group, Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

Abstract

The Pack Test (PT) is a widely used test to establish readiness for work in wildland firefighting. It is common to perform this test dressed in regular exercise clothing. However, wildland firefighters (WFF) have to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during their deployments, which increases the physiological strain and reduces their work capacity. This study aimed to analyse the impact of full PPE on PT performance. Nine male professional WFF performed in random order a PT walking at the fastest possible self-pace wearing two different clothing configurations: (i) traditional short sports gear (SG) and (ii) the PPE currently used by Spanish WFF. Heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion and lap time were recorded during the PT. In addition, oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) was estimated through the individual VO 2 –HR relationship previously obtained during a graded exercise test. There was a significant decrease in the PT performance (i.e., completion time) (~12%, p < 0.05) in PPE. The physiological demands with this configuration were significantly higher (~10%, p < 0.05). WFF spent ~13 min above the anaerobic threshold in PPE vs. ~4 min in SG. A multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that PT performance variation might be explained by the maximal aerobic velocity (84.5%) in PPE and the VO 2max (75.9%) in SG. In conclusion, wearing complete PPE increases WFF’s physiological strain, which translates into a significant PT performance reduction. Performing the test walking at the fastest possible self-pace wearing the PPE would better reflect the high-intensity effort periods reported in real scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Belén Carballo-Leyenda & Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo & Fabio García-Heras & Pilar Sánchez-Collado & José G. Villa-Vicente & Jose A. Rodríguez-Marroyo, 2021. "Influence of Personal Protective Equipment on Wildland Firefighters’ Physiological Response and Performance during the Pack Test," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-9, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5050-:d:551848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo & Fabio García-Heras & Belén Carballo-Leyenda & José G. Villa-Vicente & Juan Rodríguez-Medina & Jose A. Rodríguez-Marroyo, 2023. "Effect of a High-Intensity Circuit Training Program on the Physical Fitness of Wildland Firefighters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5050-:d:551848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.