IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p92-d468107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elaboration and Validation of Two Predictive Models of Postpartum Traumatic Stress Disorder Risk Formed by Variables Related to the Birth Process: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Hernández-Martínez

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13600 Ciudad Real, Spain)

  • Sergio Martínez-Vazquez

    (Nursing Department, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain)

  • Julián Rodríguez-Almagro

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13600 Ciudad Real, Spain)

  • Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez

    (Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
    Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano

    (Nursing Department, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain
    Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate two predictive models of postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) risk using a retrospective cohort study of women who gave birth between 2018 and 2019 in Spain. The predictive models were developed using a referral cohort of 1752 women (2/3) and were validated on a cohort of 875 women (1/3). The predictive factors in model A were delivery type, skin-to-skin contact, admission of newborn to care unit, presence of a severe tear, type of infant feeding at discharge, postpartum hospital readmission. The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) in the referral cohort was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.67–0.74), while in the validation cohort, it was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.63–0.75). The predictive factors in model B were delivery type, admission of newborn to care unit, type of infant feeding at discharge, postpartum hospital readmission, partner support, and the perception of adequate respect from health professionals. The predictive capacity of model B in both the referral cohort and the validation cohort was superior to model A with an AUC-ROC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79–0.85) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78–0.87), respectively. A predictive model (model B) formed by clinical variables and the perception of partner support and appropriate treatment by health professionals had a good predictive capacity in both the referral and validation cohorts. This model is preferred over the model (model A) that was formed exclusively by clinical variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Hernández-Martínez & Sergio Martínez-Vazquez & Julián Rodríguez-Almagro & Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez & Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano, 2020. "Elaboration and Validation of Two Predictive Models of Postpartum Traumatic Stress Disorder Risk Formed by Variables Related to the Birth Process: A Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:92-:d:468107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:92-:d:468107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.