IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p71-d467511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chewing Discomfort According to Dental Prosthesis Type in 12,802 Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jae-Hyun Lee

    (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongro-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea)

  • Da Hye Kim

    (Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea)

  • Yong-Gyu Park

    (Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea)

  • Su Young Lee

    (Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul St. Mary’s Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea)

Abstract

This study examined the prevalence of self-perceived chewing discomfort depending on the type of dental prosthesis used in South Korean adults. The subjects were 12,802 people over 20 years of age who participated in a health interview and dental examination. Chewing discomfort was examined using a self-assessed report with a structured questionnaire. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted odds ratios were evaluated along with their 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05). After adjusting for covariates, including age, gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, education, income, and toothbrushing frequency, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for chewing discomfort in groups without a dental prosthesis, with fixed dental prostheses, with removable partial dentures, and with removable complete dentures were 1 (reference), 1.363 (1.213–1.532), 2.275 (1.879–2.753), and 2.483 (1.929–3.197), respectively. The association between the prevalence of chewing discomfort and the type of dental prosthesis used was statistically significant even after adjusting for various confounders ( p < 0.0001). The type of dental prosthesis was related to chewing discomfort among South Korean adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae-Hyun Lee & Da Hye Kim & Yong-Gyu Park & Su Young Lee, 2020. "Chewing Discomfort According to Dental Prosthesis Type in 12,802 Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:71-:d:467511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/71/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/71/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:71-:d:467511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.