IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p207-d470301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to Flavored Cartridge/Pod-Based Product Ban among Adult JUUL Users: “You Get Nicotine However You Can Get It”

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica M. Yingst

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Candace R. Bordner

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Andréa L. Hobkirk

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Brianna Hoglen

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Sophia I. Allen

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Nicolle M. Krebs

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Kenneth R. Houser

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Craig Livelsberger

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

  • Jonathan Foulds

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA)

Abstract

In order to curb increasing youth electronic cigarette (e-cig) use, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the sale of flavored cartridge/pod-based products in February 2020. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the impact of the FDA ban on adult JUUL users. The samples of current adult JUUL users were surveyed via Amazon Mechanical Turk at three time-points n = 76 (Sample 1); n = 128 (Sample 2); n = 86 (Sample 3) before and after the FDA flavored/pod ban. The participants were asked to report the JUUL flavored pod used most often and answer questions on purchasing generic pods or refilling (Quantitative). JUUL users were then interviewed in order to explore their perceptions and behaviors related to the FDA ban of flavored cartridge/pod-based products (Qualitative; n = 16). Quantitative data analysis evaluated the differences in variables by time-point. Qualitative data were coded into themes while using the constant comparative method. We found a significant decrease in the use of mint pods (43.4%, 22.7%, 16.3%) ( p < 0.01), while there was a significant increase in the use of menthol pods (6.6%, 26.6%, 37.2%) ( p < 0.01). Themes that emerged from the qualitative data included switching from mint to menthol pods, refilling pods, and switching to other products that are available in the desired flavors, such as generic pods or disposable e-cigs. Future research is needed in order to evaluate the impact of these behaviors on public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica M. Yingst & Candace R. Bordner & Andréa L. Hobkirk & Brianna Hoglen & Sophia I. Allen & Nicolle M. Krebs & Kenneth R. Houser & Craig Livelsberger & Jonathan Foulds, 2020. "Response to Flavored Cartridge/Pod-Based Product Ban among Adult JUUL Users: “You Get Nicotine However You Can Get It”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:207-:d:470301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:207-:d:470301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.