IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2020i1p128-d468898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Attitudes towards Communication Skills Learning between Medical and Dental Students in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Abed Elwahab Nourein

    (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, AlMadinah AlMunawwarah 42313, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rubayyi Faris Shahadah

    (College of Dentistry, Taibah University, AlMadinah AlMunawwarah 42313, Saudi Arabia)

  • Marwan Abdulrahman Alnemer

    (College of Dentistry, Taibah University, AlMadinah AlMunawwarah 42313, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saif Saud Al-Harbi

    (College of Dentistry, Taibah University, AlMadinah AlMunawwarah 42313, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hani T. Fadel

    (Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, AlMadinah AlMunawwarah 42353, Saudi Arabia)

  • Saba Kassim

    (Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, AlMadinah AlMunawwarah 42353, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Background : Communication skills (CS) learning is a core skill in medical and dental education. The comparison of attitudes towards CS between dental and medical students based on the taught curriculum (problem-based learning vs. traditional teaching) in Saudi Arabia awaits investigation. Aims: (1) To assess the attitudes of both undergraduate dental and medical students towards communication skills (CS) learning and (2) to compare the attitudes towards CS between Medical and Dental students in relation to sociodemographic and education-related characteristics. Methods and Materials : A cross-sectional study, using an online survey, invited 260 conveniently sampled Taibah university medical and dental undergraduate students. The survey collected data on sociodemographic characteristics, education-related factors, and CS using Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) that assess positive and negative attitudes (PAS, NAS). Data analysis included descriptive statistics and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results : Of the distributed questionnaire 91% responded (145 dental and 91 medical students). There were, overall, non-significant scores’ differences between medical and dental students on PAS (Medicine Median 51 vs. Dentistry Median 50, p = 0.059) and NAS (Medicine Median 32 vs. Dentistry Median 32, p = 0.596). Older medical students, those at clinical levels and those who reported they need to improve their communication skills and student whose parents were not doctors, tended to score statistically significantly ( p = 0.032, 0.017, 0.034, and 0.004, respectively) on PAS compared with dental students; on the other hand, medical students with doctor parents scored significantly high in NAS compared to dental students ( p = 0.015). Conclusion : Demographic and education-related characteristics underpinned medical student positive attitude towards CS compared to dental students. Although medical and dental students showed no differences in self-rating their attitudes towards (CS). Different factors influence medical and dental students’ attitudes towards CS learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Abed Elwahab Nourein & Rubayyi Faris Shahadah & Marwan Abdulrahman Alnemer & Saif Saud Al-Harbi & Hani T. Fadel & Saba Kassim, 2020. "Comparative Study of Attitudes towards Communication Skills Learning between Medical and Dental Students in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:128-:d:468898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2020:i:1:p:128-:d:468898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.