IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i9p3131-d352439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Symptom-Related Distress among Indigenous Australians in Specialist End-of-Life Care: Findings from the Multi-Jurisdictional Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Data

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Woods

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Claire E. Johnson

    (Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC 3128, Australia
    School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
    Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Hanh T. Ngo

    (Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
    Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Judith M. Katzenellenbogen

    (School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
    Telethon Kids Institute, Northern Entrance, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Kevin Murray

    (School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Sandra C. Thompson

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

Abstract

Symptom relief is fundamental to palliative care. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) Australians are known to experience inequities in health care delivery and outcomes, but large-scale studies of end-of-life symptoms in this population are lacking. We compared symptom-related distress among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian patients in specialist palliative care using the multi-jurisdictional Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration dataset. Based on patient-reported rating scale responses, adjusted relative risks (aRRs) stratified by care setting were calculated for occurrence of (i) symptom-related moderate-to-severe distress and worsening distress during a first episode of care and (ii) symptom-related moderate-to-severe distress at the final pre-death assessment. The p -value significance threshold was corrected for multiple comparisons. First-episode frequencies of symptom-related distress were similar among Indigenous ( n = 1180) and non-Indigenous ( n = 107,952) patients in both inpatient and community settings. In final pre-death assessments (681 Indigenous and 67,339 non-Indigenous patients), both groups had similar occurrence of moderate-to-severe distress when care was provided in hospital. In community settings, Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous patients had lower pre-death risks of moderate-to-severe distress from overall symptom occurrence (aRR 0.78; p = 0.001; confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.91). These findings provide reassurance of reasonable equivalence of end-of-life outcomes for Indigenous patients who have been accepted for specialist palliative care.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Woods & Claire E. Johnson & Hanh T. Ngo & Judith M. Katzenellenbogen & Kevin Murray & Sandra C. Thompson, 2020. "Symptom-Related Distress among Indigenous Australians in Specialist End-of-Life Care: Findings from the Multi-Jurisdictional Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3131-:d:352439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:9:p:3131-:d:352439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.