IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i8p2904-d349066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Physical Demands of Friendly Matches and Different Types On-Field Integrated Training Sessions in Professional Soccer Players

Author

Listed:
  • Jesus Vicente Giménez

    (School of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón (Madrid), Spain
    International University of Valencia (VIU), 46002 Valencia, Spain)

  • Julen Castellano

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria, 48940 Leioa, Spain)

  • Patrycja Lipinska

    (Institute of Physical Education, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Mariusz Zasada

    (Institute of Physical Education, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Miguel-Ángel Gómez

    (Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships among physical demands of two friendly matches (FMs) and three task training sessions (TS 1,2,3 ) combining in a different way: a Small-Sided Game (SSG), Mini-Goals (MG), a ball Circuit Training (CT) and a Large-Sided Game (LSG): SSG+MG+LSG (TS 1 ), SSG+CT+LSG (TS 2 ) and MG+CT+LSG (TS 3 ). The TS and match demands in running intensities were monitored in fourteen professional soccer players (age = 23.2 ± 2.7 years, height = 178 ± 6 cm, body mass = 73.2 ± 6.9 kg, mean and SD, respectively) using 10-Hz global positioning system devices, and players’ perception of exertion was recorded after each session or match using a visual analogue scale. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction coupled with magnitude-based inferences were used. A principal component (PC) analysis was conducted on all variables to account for covariance. Three PCs were retained, explaining 76% of the variance: Component 1 explained 46.9% with the associated variables: Total Distance (TD) and distance covered in ranges of speed from >2.2 to <5 m/s, Player Load and Work Rest Ratio; component 2 explained 19.7% and was composed of TD at > 5 m/s and maximal running speed (MRS); and component 3 explained 9.5% and was represented by TD < 2.2 m/s, decelerations and accelerations. The ANOVA results showed significant differences ( p < 0.05) among TS vs. FM in TD3, TD4, TD5, and TD > 5, TD, deceleration rate, acceleration rate, maximal running speed, exertion index, work rest ratio, and self-reported exertion. Therefore, the training routines did not replicate the main set of high intensity efforts experienced in competitive conditions. Additionally, PC analysis could be applied in order to select the most representative training and competitive conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesus Vicente Giménez & Julen Castellano & Patrycja Lipinska & Mariusz Zasada & Miguel-Ángel Gómez, 2020. "Comparison of the Physical Demands of Friendly Matches and Different Types On-Field Integrated Training Sessions in Professional Soccer Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2904-:d:349066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/8/2904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arletta Hawrylak & Anna Brzeźna & Krystyna Chromik, 2021. "Distribution of Plantar Pressure in Soccer Players," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-7, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:8:p:2904-:d:349066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.