IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i7p2516-d342308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Analysis for Patient Safety in Surgical Departments: Cross-Sectional Design Usefulness

Author

Listed:
  • Verónica Aranaz Ostáriz

    (Hospital Universitario Sant Joan d’Alacant. Ctra, N-332, s/n, Sant Joan d´Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain)

  • María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro

    (Hospital Universitario Sant Joan d’Alacant. Ctra, N-332, s/n, Sant Joan d´Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain)

  • Francisco López Rodríguez-Arias

    (Hospital General Universitario de Elche, C/Almazara 11, 03203 Alicante, Spain)

  • José Lorenzo Valencia Martín

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS. M-607, km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos Aibar Remón

    (Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Avda. San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Juana Requena Puche

    (Hospital General Universitario de Elda, Ctra, Sax-La Torreta, s/n, Elda, 03600 Alicante, Spain)

  • Cristina Díaz-Agero Pérez

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS. M-607, km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain)

  • Antonio Fernando Compañ Rosique

    (Hospital Universitario Sant Joan d’Alacant. Ctra, N-332, s/n, Sant Joan d´Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain)

  • Jesús María Aranaz Andrés

    (Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS. M-607, km 9100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
    Center for Biomedical Research in the Epidemiology and Public Health Network (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

(1) Background: Identifying and measuring adverse events (AE) is a priority for patient safety, which allows us to define and prioritise areas for improvement and evaluate and develop solutions to improve health care quality. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence of AEs in surgical and medical-surgical departments and to know the health impact of these AEs. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study determining the prevalence of AEs in surgical and medical-surgical departments was conducted and a comparison was made among both clinical areas. A total of 5228 patients were admitted in 58 hospitals in Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru, within the Latin American Study of Adverse Events (IBEAS), led by the Spanish Ministry of Health, the Pan American Health Organization, and the WHO Patient Safety programme. (3) Results: The global prevalence of AEs was 10.7%. However, the prevalence of AEs in surgical departments was 11.9%, while in medical-surgical departments it was 8.9%. The causes of these AEs were associated with surgical procedures (38.6%) and nosocomial infections (35.4%). About 60.6% of the AEs extended hospital stays by 30.7 days on average and 25.8% led to readmission with an average hospitalisation of 15 days. About 22.4% resulted in death, disability, or surgical reintervention. (4) Conclusions: Surgical departments were associated with a higher risk of experiencing AEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Verónica Aranaz Ostáriz & María Teresa Gea Velázquez de Castro & Francisco López Rodríguez-Arias & José Lorenzo Valencia Martín & Carlos Aibar Remón & Juana Requena Puche & Cristina Díaz-Agero Pérez &, 2020. "Risk Analysis for Patient Safety in Surgical Departments: Cross-Sectional Design Usefulness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2516-:d:342308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/7/2516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:7:p:2516-:d:342308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.