IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i6p1849-d331737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good Practices and Learning Strategies of Undergraduate University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Margarita Gozalo

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Teacher Training College, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Benito León-del-Barco

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Teacher Training College, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

  • Santiago Mendo-Lázaro

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Teacher Training College, University of Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain)

Abstract

The educational models currently in use in higher education aim to make students active participants in their learning process, while the lecturer is seen more as a facilitator of the said process. Students’ learning strategies (superficial approach—memorizing, deep approach—looking for meaning, and achievement approach—aimed at results) and their good practices are gaining in importance and the aim of this study is to identify university students’ good practices, which are related to their learning strategies. To do so, our research covered 610 students from different science degree courses at the University of Extremadura who anonymously completed the University Students’ Good Practice Inventory (IBPEU) and the University students’ Questionnaire to Evaluate Study and Learning Processes (CEPEA). The influence of context, understood here as the center or scientific field, was discarded. The factor ‘Actively learning’ was positively associated with the deep and achievement approaches; the factor ‘Interaction with lecturers’ was positively associated with the superficial approach and negatively with the deep approach; the factor ‘Cooperative work’ was also associated with the deep approach; while the achievement approach was positively associated with the factor ‘Optimizing time’ and negatively with ‘respect for different capacities’. These associations are promising as good practices can be learnt and evaluated.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarita Gozalo & Benito León-del-Barco & Santiago Mendo-Lázaro, 2020. "Good Practices and Learning Strategies of Undergraduate University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1849-:d:331737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/6/1849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eufrasio Pérez-Navío & Óscar Gavín-Chocano & Lara Checa-Domene & Marina García-Valdecasas Prieto, 2023. "Relationship between Learning Strategies and Motivation of University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez, 2020. "Sex and Careers of University Students in Educational Practices as Factors of Individual Differences in Learning Environment and Psychological Factors during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. María del Carmen Olmos-Gómez & Mónica Luque-Suárez & Diego Becerril-Ruiz & Jesús Manuel Cuevas-Rincón, 2021. "Gender and Socioeconomic Status as Factors of Individual Differences in Pre-University Students’ Decision-Making for Careers, with a Focus on Family Influence and Psychosocial Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Lucía Herrera Torres & Mara Rachel Souza-Soares de Quadros & Laura C. Sánchez-Sánchez & Tamara Ramiro-Sánchez, 2021. "Satisfaction with Self and External Regulation of Learning in Higher Education Students in Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:6:p:1849-:d:331737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.