IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1606-d327471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study on Different Remediation Strategies Applied in Petroleum-Contaminated Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Jia-Qi Cui

    (Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    SynBio Research Platform, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qing-Sheng He

    (Sinopec Engineering Group Luoyang R&D Center of Technology, Henan 471000, China)

  • Ming-Hui Liu

    (CNOOC EnerTech Beijing Research Institute of Engineering and Technology for Safety and Environmental Protection, Tianjin 300457, China)

  • Hong Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    SynBio Research Platform, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Ming-Bo Sun

    (Sinopec Engineering Group Luoyang R&D Center of Technology, Henan 471000, China)

  • Jian-Ping Wen

    (Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    SynBio Research Platform, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Due to the increasing pollution by petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs), it is an important task to develop eco-friendly and highly efficient methods for remediating petroleum-contaminated soils. In this study, bioremediation technology was applied to remediate PHs contaminated soils, and the bacterial community structure and physicochemical characteristics of the soil treated using different bioremediation regimens were analyzed. Compared with the control condition (S0), the PHs removal efficiency of biostimulation (S2) and bioaugmentation (S3) was increased significantly. Combined biostimulation with bioaugmentation (S4) had the highest PHs removal efficiency, up to 60.14 ± 4.12%. Among all the selected remediation strategies (S1–S4, S1: soil moisture content: 25–30%), the bacterial alpha-diversity was higher than in S0. The genera Acinetobacter , Escherichia-Shigella , Bacteroides , Microbacterium , and Parabacteroides were found to greatly contribute to PHs’ degradation. In the group S4, the PH-degraders and soil enzyme activity were higher than in the other remediation regimens, and these indices gradually decreased in the mid-to-later periods of all remediation tests. Additionally, the abundance of alkB and nah genes was increased by improving the environmental condition of the microorganism communities. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) had a positive correlation with total PHs degradation. This study offers insights into the microbial community response to environmental factors during bioremediation, which shows a promoting effect in enhancing the efficiency of PHs remediation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia-Qi Cui & Qing-Sheng He & Ming-Hui Liu & Hong Chen & Ming-Bo Sun & Jian-Ping Wen, 2020. "Comparative Study on Different Remediation Strategies Applied in Petroleum-Contaminated Soils," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1606-:d:327471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1606-:d:327471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.