IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1594-d327041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Experience of Caring for a Severely Disabled Relative Impact Advance Care Planning? A Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Disabled Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Fu-Ming Chiang

    (Department of Nursing, Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 97002, Taiwan)

  • Jyh-Gang Hsieh

    (Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Health and Welfare Policy, National Yang-Ming University, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 97002, Taiwan)

  • Sheng-Yu Fan

    (Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Wei Wang

    (Institute of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan
    Department of Family Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 97002, Taiwan)

  • Shu-Chen Wang

    (Department of Nursing, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 97002, Taiwan)

Abstract

The aging of the Taiwanese population has become a major issue. Previous research has focused on the burden and stress faced by caregivers, but has not explored how the experience of these caregivers influences decisions of advance care planning (ACP). Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were conducted. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify important themes. Five themes and fourteen sub-themes were identified: (1) Past experiences: patient wishes, professional recommendations, and expectation about disease progress; (2) Impact of care on family members: positive affirmation, open-minded life, social isolation and health effects, and financial and life planning effects; (3) Attitude toward life: not forcing to stay, and not becoming a burden, (4) Expected proxy dilemmas: torment between doing or not, seeing the extension of suffering and toil, and remorse and self-blame; (5) Expectation of end of life (EOL) care: caregiver’s experience and EOL care decisions, and practicality of EOL decision making. After making multiple medical decisions for their disabled relatives, caregivers are able to calmly face their own medical decisions, and “not becoming a burden” is their primary consideration. It’s suggested that implementation of shared decision-making on medical care for patients with chronic disability will not only improve the quality of their medical care but also reduce the development of remorse and guilty feelings of caregivers after making medical decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu-Ming Chiang & Jyh-Gang Hsieh & Sheng-Yu Fan & Ying-Wei Wang & Shu-Chen Wang, 2020. "Does the Experience of Caring for a Severely Disabled Relative Impact Advance Care Planning? A Qualitative Study of Caregivers of Disabled Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1594-:d:327041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pei-Yu Tsai & Wen-Han Huang & Yu-Jun Chang, 2021. "Could Caregivers’ Stressful Care Experiences Be Related to Their Attitudes towards Advance Care Planning? A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1594-:d:327041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.