IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i3p918-d315451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Users’ Modifications to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Interviews with ENDS Enthusiasts

Author

Listed:
  • Yachao Li

    (Department of Communication Studies and Department of Public Health, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA)

  • Robert T. Fairman

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA)

  • Victoria Churchill

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA)

  • David L. Ashley

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA)

  • Lucy Popova

    (School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA)

Abstract

Users’ modifications to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) products could increase initiation, inhibit cessation, or change the toxicity of the product. This study aims to begin to identify consumers’ common ENDS modification behaviors. We conducted audio-recorded, in-depth one-on-one interviews with 13 adult ENDS users in the metropolitan Atlanta area, who self-reported extensive modification experience. Modifications to coils, batteries, and e-liquids were commonly mentioned. Participants indicated that users modified devices to produce large clouds, change levels of nicotine delivery, alter tastes of e-liquids, and experience different throat hits. Because manufacturers have changed product characteristics to be in line with consumer preferences, interviewees indicated that fewer users currently engage in modifications to coils and batteries compared to the more widespread practice a few years ago. Hobbyists continue to perform modifications and many users continue to misuse or abuse e-liquids, despite the view that fewer users currently alter their ENDS than in the past. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory actions that limit certain product characteristics may unintentionally increase the likelihood that users will once again make more extensive modifications to their products, and this should be considered as part of the FDA’s regulatory decision-making process.

Suggested Citation

  • Yachao Li & Robert T. Fairman & Victoria Churchill & David L. Ashley & Lucy Popova, 2020. "Users’ Modifications to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Interviews with ENDS Enthusiasts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:918-:d:315451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/918/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/918/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:918-:d:315451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.