IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i3p1091-d318355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Respiratory Muscular Strength Compared to Predicted Values in Patients with Stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Maria Ramos

    (Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Avenue Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Daniela Maciel da Silva

    (Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Avenue Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Daniela Vieira Buchaim

    (Postgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Avenue Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, São Paulo, Brazil
    Medical School, University Center of Adamantina (UniFAI), Nove de Julho Street, 730–Centro, Adamantina 17800-000, São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Rogério Leone Buchaim

    (Postgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Avenue Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, São Paulo, Brazil
    Department of Biological Sciences (Anatomy), Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75–Vila Universitaria, Bauru 17012-901, São Paulo, Brazil)

  • Mauro Audi

    (Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Avenue Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, São Paulo, Brazil
    Postgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Avenue Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marília 17525-902, São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength of individuals affected by stroke and to compare it with the predicted values in the literature considering their corresponding age. Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated in 22 elderly people who had sequels of stroke, four with right hemiparesis, 16 with left hemiparesis and two with bilateral, of ages ranging from 34 to 82 years. The collected data were submitted to statistical analysis using a Mann–Whitney test to evaluate if there was a significant difference in the average data collected when compared with a mean of the predicted data in the literature. Fourteen men and eight women were evaluated, who obtained mean values of 71.85 cmH 2 O and 57.75 cmH 2 O, respectively, for a maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and when compared to the predicted values for men and women, 105.41 cmH 2 O ( p -value 0.0019) and 80.57 cmH 2 O ( p -value 0.00464) were significantly lower. For a maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), the mean value obtained for men was 62.28 cmH 2 O and 49.5 cmH 2 O for women, whereas the predicted values in the literature were 114.79 cmH 2 O ( p -value < 0.0001) and 78, 46 cmH 2 O ( p -value 0.0059), respectively. In the statistical analysis, it was possible to notice that the studied population did not reach the predicted age indexes and that there was a significant difference between the median columns. In conclusion, there is a weakness in the respiratory muscles of hemiparetic men and women due to stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Maria Ramos & Daniela Maciel da Silva & Daniela Vieira Buchaim & Rogério Leone Buchaim & Mauro Audi, 2020. "Evaluation of Respiratory Muscular Strength Compared to Predicted Values in Patients with Stroke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:1091-:d:318355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/1091/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/1091/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:1091-:d:318355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.