IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p588-d309532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Cattoni

    (Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20121 Milan, Italy
    Department of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20121 Milan, Italy)

  • Giulia Tetè

    (Department of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20121 Milan, Italy
    Specialization School in Oral Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, 20121 Milan, Italy)

  • Riccardo Uccioli

    (Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20121 Milan, Italy
    Department of Dentistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20121 Milan, Italy)

  • Fabio Manazza

    (Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20121 Milan, Italy)

  • Giorgio Gastaldi

    (Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20121 Milan, Italy
    Unit of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, San Rocco Clinical Institute, Ome, 25050 Brescia, Italy)

  • Daniela Perani

    (Department of Nuclear Medicine and Division of Neuroscience, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele University, 20121 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Objectives: In this functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study, we investigated the activation of cerebral pathways involved in the elaboration of self-retracting photos (SELF) and the same pictures of others (OTHER). Each of the photographs showed one of the participants during different stages of the rehabilitation: pre-treatment (PRE), virtual planning using “Smile-Lynx” smile design software (VIR), and post-rehabilitation (POST). Methods: We selected eighteen volunteers, both male and female, between 22 and 67 years of age, who previously underwent prosthetic rehabilitation. Each of them was subjected to an fMRI acquisition. Various stimuli were then shown to the subjects in the form of self-retracting photographs and photographs of other participants, all in pseudo-randomized order. We then carried out a two- stage mixed-effects group data analysis with statistical contrast targeting two main effects: one regarding the main effect of Identity (SELF vs. OTHER) and the other regarding the effect of the prosthetic rehabilitation phase (PRE vs. VIR vs. POS). All the effects mentioned above survived a peak-level of p < 0.05. Results: For the effect of identity, results reported the involvement of dorsolateral frontoparietal areas bilaterally. For the phase by identity effect, results reported activation in the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the right hemisphere. A stronger activation in observing self-retracting photos (SELF) post-treatment (POST) was reported compared to the other phases considered in the experiment. Conclusions: All the collected data showed differences regarding the main effect of Identity (SELF vs. OTHER). Most importantly, the present study provides some trend-wise evidence that the pictures portraying the subject in their actual physiognomy (POST) have a somewhat special status in eliciting selectively greater brain activation in the SMA. This effect was interpreted as a plausible correlate of an empathic response for beautiful and neutral faces. The present research suggests a possible way to measure self-perception of the subject after an appearance-altering procedure such an implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. However, future clinical studies are needed to investigate this matter further.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Cattoni & Giulia Tetè & Riccardo Uccioli & Fabio Manazza & Giorgio Gastaldi & Daniela Perani, 2020. "An fMRI Study on Self-Perception of Patients after Aesthetic Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:588-:d:309532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/588/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/588/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesca Cattoni & Luca Chirico & Alberto Merlone & Michele Manacorda & Raffaele Vinci & Enrico Felice Gherlone, 2021. "Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in “All on Four” Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:588-:d:309532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.