IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p531-d308708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acute and Subchronic Oral Toxicity Study of Gardenia Yellow E500 in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqiao Tang

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yangfeng Wang

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China
    Fuling District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing 408000, China)

  • Wenxiang Yang

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yanhua Zheng

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Chunxia Liu

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Min Qu

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Haibin Xu

    (China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100022, China)

  • Lei Zhang

    (China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100022, China)

  • Jiang Liang

    (China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing 100022, China)

  • Bolin Fan

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory for Applied Toxicology, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the acute and subchronic toxicity of gardenia yellow, a natural colorant widely used in China and other Asian countries. An acute toxicity test was performed in S-D rats of both genders and the lethal dose (LD 50 ) of per oral gardenia yellow was estimated to be more than 15.0 g/kg·bw. In the subchronic study, gardenia yellow was orally administered to rats by gavage at doses of 0, 0.50, 1.50 and 4.50 g/kg·bw/day for 90 days followed by a recovery period of 28 days. No appreciable toxic-related changes were observed in the 0.50 g/kg·bw/day group. When the animals received gardenia yellow at 1.50 g/kg·bw/day or more, body weight loss was observed, and pigments began to deposit in several vital organs, resulting in significant changes of several hematological and biochemical indicators related to the nutritional status of the body, liver and kidney function, more severe in the high dose group. In the recovery period, the alterations of the clinical symptoms and parameters were relieved a lot. Based on the results of the current study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of gardenia yellow E500 in rats was set to be 0.50 g/kg·bw/day.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqiao Tang & Yangfeng Wang & Wenxiang Yang & Yanhua Zheng & Chunxia Liu & Min Qu & Haibin Xu & Lei Zhang & Jiang Liang & Bolin Fan, 2020. "Acute and Subchronic Oral Toxicity Study of Gardenia Yellow E500 in Sprague-Dawley Rats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:531-:d:308708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:531-:d:308708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.