IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p380-d305853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Respiratory Anatomical Development, Air Flow Characterization and Particle Deposition

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad S. Islam

    (School of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Gunther Paul

    (Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Mackay, QLD 4741, Australia)

  • Hui X. Ong

    (Respiratory Technology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia)

  • Paul M. Young

    (Respiratory Technology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, 431 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia)

  • Y. T. Gu

    (School of Chemistry, Physics & Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology 2 George Street, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia)

  • Suvash C. Saha

    (School of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

Abstract

The understanding of complex inhalation and transport processes of pollutant particles through the human respiratory system is important for investigations into dosimetry and respiratory health effects in various settings, such as environmental or occupational health. The studies over the last few decades for micro- and nanoparticle transport and deposition have advanced the understanding of drug-aerosol impacts in the mouth-throat and the upper airways. However, most of the Lagrangian and Eulerian studies have utilized the non-realistic symmetric anatomical model for airflow and particle deposition predictions. Recent improvements to visualization techniques using high-resolution computed tomography (CT) data and the resultant development of three dimensional (3-D) anatomical models support the realistic representation of lung geometry. Yet, the selection of different modelling approaches to analyze the transitional flow behavior and the use of different inlet and outlet conditions provide a dissimilar prediction of particle deposition in the human lung. Moreover, incorporation of relevant physical and appropriate boundary conditions are important factors to consider for the more accurate prediction of transitional flow and particle transport in human lung. This review critically appraises currently available literature on airflow and particle transport mechanism in the lungs, as well as numerical simulations with the aim to explore processes involved. Numerical studies found that both the Euler–Lagrange (E-L) and Euler–Euler methods do not influence nanoparticle (particle diameter ≤50 nm) deposition patterns at a flow rate ≤25 L/min. Furthermore, numerical studies demonstrated that turbulence dispersion does not significantly affect nanoparticle deposition patterns. This critical review aims to develop the field and increase the state-of-the-art in human lung modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad S. Islam & Gunther Paul & Hui X. Ong & Paul M. Young & Y. T. Gu & Suvash C. Saha, 2020. "A Review of Respiratory Anatomical Development, Air Flow Characterization and Particle Deposition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:380-:d:305853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiao Inthavong & Kai Zhang & Jiyuan Tu, 2011. "Numerical modelling of nanoparticle deposition in the nasal cavity and the tracheobronchial airway," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(07), pages 633-643.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parth Singh & Vishnu Raghav & Vignesh Padhmashali & Gunther Paul & Mohammad S. Islam & Suvash C. Saha, 2020. "Airflow and Particle Transport Prediction through Stenosis Airways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Mohammad S. Islam & Tianxin Fang & Callum Oldfield & Puchanee Larpruenrudee & Hamidreza Mortazavy Beni & Md. M. Rahman & Shahid Husain & Yuantong Gu, 2022. "Heat Wave and Bushfire Meteorology in New South Wales, Australia: Air Quality and Health Impacts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Mohammad S. Islam & Puchanee Larpruenrudee & Sheikh I. Hossain & Mohammad Rahimi-Gorji & Yuantong Gu & Suvash C. Saha & Gunther Paul, 2021. "Polydisperse Aerosol Transport and Deposition in Upper Airways of Age-Specific Lung," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Concepción Paz & Eduardo Suárez & Oscar Parga & Jesús Vence, 2017. "Glottis effects on the cough clearance process simulated with a CFD dynamic mesh and Eulerian wall film model," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(12), pages 1326-1338, September.
    2. Ismael R. Cal & Jose Luis Cercos-Pita & Daniel Duque, 2017. "The incompressibility assumption in computational simulations of nasal airflow," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 853-868, June.
    3. Parth Singh & Vishnu Raghav & Vignesh Padhmashali & Gunther Paul & Mohammad S. Islam & Suvash C. Saha, 2020. "Airflow and Particle Transport Prediction through Stenosis Airways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:380-:d:305853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.