IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p9081-d457244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harm Reduction Practices and Needs in a Belgian Chemsex Context: Findings from a Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Herrijgers

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Karolien Poels

    (Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Heidi Vandebosch

    (Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Tom Platteau

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
    Department of Psychology, Open University, 6400 Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Jacques van Lankveld

    (Department of Psychology, Open University, 6400 Heerlen, The Netherlands)

  • Eric Florence

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

Chemsex is a growing public health concern, with little evidence-based care and support available. The aim of this study is to understand current risk reduction practices, and the information and care needs of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) who engage in chemsex. Between January and March 2020, semi structured in-depth interviews with drug-using GBMSM ( n = 20) were conducted. Data were analyzed thematically. The reported preparatory measures were: deliberately scheduling chemsex sessions, and discussing preferences regarding setting and attendees. During the event, a logbook is kept to monitor drugs taken by each participant. People try to take care of each other, but this is often counteracted. Respondents highlighted needs: reliable and easily-accessible information, anonymous medical and psychological healthcare, chemsex-specific care, and a value-neutral safe space to talk about chemsex experiences. Results imply two types of users: planned and impulsive users. Adherence to intended harm reduction practices are complicated by drug effects, peer pressure, and feelings of distrust among users.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Herrijgers & Karolien Poels & Heidi Vandebosch & Tom Platteau & Jacques van Lankveld & Eric Florence, 2020. "Harm Reduction Practices and Needs in a Belgian Chemsex Context: Findings from a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9081-:d:457244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9081/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9081/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9081-:d:457244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.