IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8858-d452872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Salience of Birdsong and Insect Song with Equal Sound Pressure Level and Loudness

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshiharu Soeta

    (Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Osaka 563-8577, Japan)

  • Ayaka Ariki

    (Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Osaka 563-8577, Japan)

Abstract

Birdsong is used to communicate the position of stairwells to visually impaired people in train stations in Japan. However, more than 40% of visually impaired people reported that such sounds were difficult to identify. Train companies seek to present the sounds at a sound pressure level that is loud enough to be detected, but not so loud as to be annoying. Therefore, salient birdsongs with relatively low sound pressure levels are required. In the current study, we examined the salience of different types of birdsong and insect song, and determined the dominant physical parameters related to salience. We considered insect songs because both birdsongs and insect songs have been found to have positive effects on soundscapes. We evaluated subjective saliences of birdsongs and insect songs using paired comparison methods, and examined the relationships between subjective salience and physical parameters. In total, 62 participants evaluated 18 types of bird songs and 16 types of insect sounds. The results indicated that the following features significantly influenced subjective salience: the maximum peak amplitude of the autocorrelation function, which signifies pitch strength; the interaural cross-correlation coefficient, which signifies apparent source width; the amplitude fluctuation component; and spectral content, such as flux and skewness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshiharu Soeta & Ayaka Ariki, 2020. "Subjective Salience of Birdsong and Insect Song with Equal Sound Pressure Level and Loudness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8858-:d:452872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8858-:d:452872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.