IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8787-d451789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Laser-Doppler Flowmetry to Evaluate the Therapeutic Response in Dentin Hypersensitivity

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Miron

    (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Dental Emergencies, Faculty of Dentistry, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, P-ta Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Diana Lungeanu

    (Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, Department of Functional Sciences, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, P-ta Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Edmond Ciora

    (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Dental Emergencies, Faculty of Dentistry, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, P-ta Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Emilia Ogodescu

    (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, P-ta Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Carmen Todea

    (Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Dental Emergencies, Faculty of Dentistry, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, P-ta Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a common medical condition with underreported prevalence and it is difficult to quantify. This study aimed to investigate whether assessing dental pulp vascular micro-dynamics by laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) would be functional for therapeutic evaluation, in contrast to a verbal rating scale (VRS). A split-mouth single-blind randomized study was conducted on seven patients and a total of 36 teeth. Two DH therapeutic methods were employed: (i) fluoride gel; (ii) Nd:YAG radiation combined with fluoride gel. For each tooth, five consecutive LDF determinations of pulp blood flow were made (before and immediately after desensitizing treatment, then after 24 h, 7 days, and 1 month), and the VRS was applied each time. Spearman’s correlation was applied for concurrent validation. Two-way (treatment and patient) repeated measures ANOVA full factorial was applied, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc comparisons and Pillai’s trace multivariate statistic. While VRS scores had moderate reliability, LDF could objectively estimate treatment effects. Based on partial eta-squared values, treatment and patient characteristics were estimated to explain about 84% and 50% of the variability, respectively. In conclusion, LDF is an objective technique that can quantitatively assess DH evolution, and it is effective in reliably monitoring oral health therapeutic interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Miron & Diana Lungeanu & Edmond Ciora & Emilia Ogodescu & Carmen Todea, 2020. "Using Laser-Doppler Flowmetry to Evaluate the Therapeutic Response in Dentin Hypersensitivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8787-:d:451789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8787/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8787/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daliana-Emanuela Mocuta & Mariana I. Miron & Diana Lungeanu & Marius Mateas & Emilia Ogodescu & Carmen D. Todea, 2022. "Laser Er:YAG-Assisted Debonding May Be a Viable Alternative to the Conventional Method for Monocrystalline Ceramic Brackets," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8787-:d:451789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.