IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8730-d450453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-Creating and Evaluating an App-Based Well-Being Intervention: The HOW (Healthier Outcomes at Work) Social Work Project

Author

Listed:
  • Jermaine M Ravalier

    (Newton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK)

  • Elaine Wainwright

    (Newton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK)

  • Nina Smyth

    (School of Social Sciences, Psychology, University of Westminster, London W1W 6UW, UK)

  • Oliver Clabburn

    (Wellcome Centre for Cultures and Environments of Health, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QH, UK)

  • Paulina Wegrzynek

    (Newton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK)

  • Mark Loon

    (Newton Park Campus, School of Science, Bath Spa University, Bath BA29BN, UK)

Abstract

Stress and mental health at work are the leading causes of long-term sickness absence in the UK, with chronically poor working conditions impacting employee physiological and psychological health. Social workers play a significant part in the fabric of UK society, but have one of the most stressful occupations in the country. The aim of this project was to work with UK social workers to co-develop, implement, and evaluate a series of smartphone-based mental health initiatives. A Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, consisting of semi-structured interviews and focus group and steering group discussions, was utilized to design the mental health and well-being interventions. Study efficacy was evaluated via a pre- and post-intervention survey and post-intervention semi-structured interviews. Interventions developed were psycho-educational, improved top-down and bottom-up communication, and provided access to a Vocational Rehabilitation Assistant for those struggling and at risk of sickness absence. Six months following dissemination, surveys demonstrated significant improvements in communication, and mean score improvements in four other working conditions. This project, therefore, demonstrates that co-developed initiatives can be positively impactful, despite post-intervention data collection being impacted by COVID-19. Future studies should build upon these findings and broaden the PAR approach nationally while taking a robust approach to evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jermaine M Ravalier & Elaine Wainwright & Nina Smyth & Oliver Clabburn & Paulina Wegrzynek & Mark Loon, 2020. "Co-Creating and Evaluating an App-Based Well-Being Intervention: The HOW (Healthier Outcomes at Work) Social Work Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8730-:d:450453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fábio André Matos & Filipe Moreira Alves & Peter Roebeling & Rita Mendonça & Rúben Mendes & Max López-Maciel & André Vizinho, 2023. "Participatory Action Research Challenges Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Comparison across Two European Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Emma Cedstrand & Helle Mølsted Alvesson & Hanna Augustsson & Theo Bodin & Erika Bodin & Anna Nyberg & Gun Johansson, 2021. "Co-Creating an Occupational Health Intervention within the Construction Industry in Sweden: Stakeholder Perceptions of the Process and Output," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8730-:d:450453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.