IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8711-d449977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Food Safety Risk Posed by Birds Entering Leafy Greens Fields in the US Southwest

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge M. Fonseca

    (United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Food Quality Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA)

  • Sadhana Ravishankar

    (School of Animal & Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, 1117 E. Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA)

  • Charles A. Sanchez

    (Maricopa Agricultural Center, Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Arizona, 37860 W. Smith-Enke Rd, Maricopa, AZ 85138, USA)

  • Eunhee Park

    (United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Food Quality Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA)

  • Kurt D. Nolte

    (Food and Drug administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Produces Safety Network-Western Region, College Park, MD 20740, USA)

Abstract

In the US Southwest, it is common to observe birds in leafy green fields, though the risk they contribute to foodborne outbreaks remains unclear. In this study, we investigated and recorded the relationship between birds near leafy green fields and the risk for contaminated irrigation water or leafy green plants. We monitored the presence of birds for over two years and performed cloacal swab analysis for non-pathogenic Escherichia coli , E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica , while also monitoring the incidence of other microbial indicators. We also assessed the risks from bird feces by performing observations in a commercial field reported with Salmonella positive samples and by analyzing the survival of foodborne pathogens in bird feces. Our results showed that most of the birds near the crop fields were resident small birds. We did not observe a correlation between the number of birds in sites and the incidence of indicator bacteria (e.g., coliforms, E. coli ) in irrigation canal water, with the exception of one out of four sites where water flow was low or stagnant. Using walk-in-traps, 305 birds were captured and placed in short-term captivity to determine the presence of various bacteria. None of the birds tested positive for E. coli O157:H7 or Salmonella . However, nearly 40% of the birds captured were confirmed positive for non-pathogenic E. coli . We found no correlation between age (young, adult, unknown), gender (male, female, unknown) and the incidence of E. coli positive birds, but we observed significantly higher probability of incidence during October–December. The role of relative humidity and temperature on bacterial survival appeared to play a key role in the survival of Salmonella on the leaves of spinach plants in a commercial field. This was also confirmed in laboratory conditions where Salmonella inoculated in bird feces and exposed to 15 °C and 80% RH(Relative humidity) survived beyond 133 days, while at 26 °C and 40% RH, the organism was undetectable after 63 days. Our results suggest that local birds associated with leafy green fields likely pose a minimal impact of risk for food contamination, but also points out the need for increased analysis specifically for E. coli O157:H7. Furthermore, our study suggests the need for expanding research that addresses risks associated with large migratory birds, especially in areas where stagnated water sources would be used for overhead sprinkle irrigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge M. Fonseca & Sadhana Ravishankar & Charles A. Sanchez & Eunhee Park & Kurt D. Nolte, 2020. "Assessing the Food Safety Risk Posed by Birds Entering Leafy Greens Fields in the US Southwest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8711-:d:449977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8711/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8711/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8711-:d:449977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.