IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8483-d445851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Practices and Existing Gaps of Continuing Medical Education among Resident Physicians in Abha City, Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Safar Abadi Alsaleem

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Najwa Mohammed Almoalwi

    (Family Medicine Department, Aseer General Directorate of Health, Abha 62523, Saudi Arabia)

  • Aesha Farheen Siddiqui

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Abadi Alsaleem

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Awad S. Alsamghan

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nabil J. Awadalla

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

  • Ahmed A. Mahfouz

    (Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Epidemiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21511, Egypt)

Abstract

Background: Continuing medical education (CME) is an everlasting process throughout the physician’s working life. It helps to deliver better services for the patients. Objectives: To explore CME among resident physicians in Abha City; their current practices, their opinions, and barriers faced. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among resident physicians at the Ministry of Health hospitals in Abha City using a validated self-administered questionnaire. It included personal characteristics, current CME practices, satisfaction with CME, and barriers to attendance. Results: The present study included 300 residents from 15 training specialties. Their reported CME activities during the previous year were lectures and seminars (79.7%) followed by conferences (43.7%), case presentations (39.7%), workshops (34.0%), group discussion (29/7%), and journal clubs (27.3%). Astonishingly enough, very few (8%) attended online electronic CME activities. There were significant differences in CME satisfaction scores by different training specialties. Regarding residents’ perceptions of the effectiveness of different CME activities (conferences/symposia, workshops/courses, and interdepartmental activities) the results showed that workshops and courses were significantly the most effective method compared to the other two methods in retention of knowledge, improving attitudes, improving clinical skills, improving managerial skills, and in improving practice behaviors. Barriers reported were being busy, lack of interest, high cost, and lack of suitable providers. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that online learning be promoted as a CME format for trainees. There should be support of residents and clinicians through the provision of protected time for their CME activities outside their daily clinical commitments.

Suggested Citation

  • Safar Abadi Alsaleem & Najwa Mohammed Almoalwi & Aesha Farheen Siddiqui & Mohammed Abadi Alsaleem & Awad S. Alsamghan & Nabil J. Awadalla & Ahmed A. Mahfouz, 2020. "Current Practices and Existing Gaps of Continuing Medical Education among Resident Physicians in Abha City, Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8483-:d:445851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8483-:d:445851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.