IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8298-d442612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Clinical Utility and Systematic Reporting in Case Studies of Healthcare Process Mining. Comment on: 10.3390/ijerph17041348 “Towards the Use of Standardised Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare”

Author

Listed:
  • Dylan A. Mordaunt

    (Shoalhaven Hospital Group, Illawarra-Shoalhaven Local Health District, Nowra 2541, Australia
    Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia
    College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia
    School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia)

Abstract

Recently in Environmental Research and Public Health , Helm and colleagues reported on a systematic review of healthcare process mining (HPM) case reports, focusing on the reporting of technical and clinical aspects and discussing standardisation terms in future HCM reports utilising existing ontologies [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Dylan A. Mordaunt, 2020. "On Clinical Utility and Systematic Reporting in Case Studies of Healthcare Process Mining. Comment on: 10.3390/ijerph17041348 “Towards the Use of Standardised Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Proces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-4, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8298-:d:442612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuel Helm & Anna M. Lin & David Baumgartner & Alvin C. Lin & Josef Küng, 2020. "Towards the Use of Standardized Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      n/a;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8298-:d:442612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.