IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8187-d440622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Feasibility Study Using a Machine Learning Suicide Risk Prediction Model Based on Open-Ended Interview Language in Adolescent Therapy Sessions

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Cohen

    (Clarigent Health, 5412 Courseview Drive, Suite 210, Mason, OH 45040, USA)

  • Jennifer Wright-Berryman

    (Department of Social Work, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA)

  • Lesley Rohlfs

    (Clarigent Health, 5412 Courseview Drive, Suite 210, Mason, OH 45040, USA)

  • Donald Wright

    (Clarigent Health, 5412 Courseview Drive, Suite 210, Mason, OH 45040, USA)

  • Marci Campbell

    (Clarigent Health, 5412 Courseview Drive, Suite 210, Mason, OH 45040, USA)

  • Debbie Gingrich

    (The Children’s Home, 5050 Madison Road, Cincinnati, OH 45227, USA)

  • Daniel Santel

    (Department of Pediatrics, Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA)

  • John Pestian

    (Department of Pediatrics, Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA)

Abstract

Background: As adolescent suicide rates continue to rise, innovation in risk identification is warranted. Machine learning can identify suicidal individuals based on their language samples. This feasibility pilot was conducted to explore this technology’s use in adolescent therapy sessions and assess machine learning model performance. Method: Natural language processing machine learning models to identify level of suicide risk using a smartphone app were tested in outpatient therapy sessions. Data collection included language samples, depression and suicidality standardized scale scores, and therapist impression of the client’s mental state. Previously developed models were used to predict suicidal risk. Results: 267 interviews were collected from 60 students in eight schools by ten therapists, with 29 students indicating suicide or self-harm risk. During external validation, models were trained on suicidal speech samples collected from two separate studies. We found that support vector machines (AUC: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.69–0.81) and logistic regression (AUC: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.70–0.82) lead to good discriminative ability, with an extreme gradient boosting model performing the best (AUC: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72–0.84). Conclusion: Voice collection technology and associated procedures can be integrated into mental health therapists’ workflow. Collected language samples could be classified with good discrimination using machine learning methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Cohen & Jennifer Wright-Berryman & Lesley Rohlfs & Donald Wright & Marci Campbell & Debbie Gingrich & Daniel Santel & John Pestian, 2020. "A Feasibility Study Using a Machine Learning Suicide Risk Prediction Model Based on Open-Ended Interview Language in Adolescent Therapy Sessions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8187-:d:440622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert J. Cramer & Raymond Tucker, 2021. "Improving the Field’s Understanding of Suicide Protective Factors and Translational Suicide Prevention Initiatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-3, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8187-:d:440622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.