IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7949-d436973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the Digital Assessment of Precise Physical Activity (DAPPA) Tool for Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Rosie Essery

    (Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • James Denison-Day

    (Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Elisabeth Grey

    (Centre for Motivation and Health Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK)

  • Emma Priestley

    (Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Katherine Bradbury

    (Centre for Clinical and Community Applications of Health Psychology (CCCAHP), University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Nanette Mutrie

    (Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK)

  • Max J. Western

    (Centre for Motivation and Health Behaviour Change, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK)

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is central to maintaining health and wellbeing as we age. Valid, reliable measurement tools are vital for understanding, and evaluating PA. There are limited options for comprehensively, accurately and affordably measuring older adults’ PA at scale at present. We aimed to develop a digital PA measurement tool specifically for adults aged 65+ using a person-based approach. We collated evidence from target users, field experts and the relevant literature to learn how older adults comprehend PA and would accept a digital tool. Findings suggest that older adults’ PA is often integrated into their daily life activities and that commonly applied terminology (e.g., moderate and vigorous) can be difficult to interpret. We also found that there is increasing familiarity with digital platforms amongst older adults, and that technological simplicity is valued. These findings informed the development of a digital tool that asks users to report their activities across key PA domains and dimensions from the previous 7-days. Users found the tool easy to navigate and comprehensive in terms of activity reporting. However, real-world usability testing revealed that users struggled with seven-day recall. Further work will address the identified issues, including creating a single-day reporting option, before commencing work to validate this new tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosie Essery & James Denison-Day & Elisabeth Grey & Emma Priestley & Katherine Bradbury & Nanette Mutrie & Max J. Western, 2020. "Development of the Digital Assessment of Precise Physical Activity (DAPPA) Tool for Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7949-:d:436973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7949/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7949/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Nobles & Clare Thomas & Zoe Banks Gross & Malcolm Hamilton & Zoe Trinder-Widdess & Christopher Speed & Andy Gibson & Rosie Davies & Michelle Farr & Russell Jago & Charlie Foster & Sabi Redwood, 2020. "“Let’s Talk about Physical Activity”: Understanding the Preferences of Under-Served Communities when Messaging Physical Activity Guidelines to the Public," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7949-:d:436973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.